Understanding the mental health and recovery needs of Canadian youth with mental health disorders: a Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) collaboration protocol.
Measurement
Mental health
Patient engagement
Young adult
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
12
2018
accepted:
22
01
2019
entrez:
9
2
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
9
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While considerable progress is being made to understand the health and self-management needs of youth with mental health disorders, little attention has focused on the mental health and recovery needs that the youth themselves identify-this despite a national priority to incorporate patient-oriented research into the development and assessment of mental health services. To address this gap, estimates of the extent to which existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-originally developed for use amongst adult populations-are clinically meaningful and psychometrically fit for use among youth are needed. In tandem, a recovery profile for youth can be constructed incorporating the youth perspective of the services provided within a community mental health setting. This study will utilize a mixed methods design incorporating qualitative focus group interviews and cross-sectional survey. Our process will begin with the hiring of a youth peer research partner who will provide lived experience expertise through all phases of the study. We will advertise, recruit, and conduct four focus groups with youth who receive services from the Foundry Vancouver Granville located in British Columbia, Canada. In the first two focus groups, we will recruit youth aged 15-18 years (n = 10). In the second two focus groups, we will recruit young adults aged 19-24 years (n = 10). In parallel, we will conduct a cross-sectional survey of the recovery and mental health needs of youth, informed by ten widely used and validated PROM. Thematic analysis techniques will guide the identification of predominant thematic trends in the qualitative focus group data. We will use Classical and Rasch measurement methods to test and analyze the reliability and validity of selected PROM measures for youth populations. The proposed study has the potential to produce a preliminary conceptual and measurement model for understanding the mental health and recovery needs of youth with mental health disorders. This evidence will inform how youth mental health services can grow, support, and sustain the capacity for a collaborative, interdisciplinary and innovative patient-oriented research environment. Findings will also contribute much needed evidence to improve the standard of care for youth who experience mental health disorders in Canada and beyond.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While considerable progress is being made to understand the health and self-management needs of youth with mental health disorders, little attention has focused on the mental health and recovery needs that the youth themselves identify-this despite a national priority to incorporate patient-oriented research into the development and assessment of mental health services. To address this gap, estimates of the extent to which existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-originally developed for use amongst adult populations-are clinically meaningful and psychometrically fit for use among youth are needed. In tandem, a recovery profile for youth can be constructed incorporating the youth perspective of the services provided within a community mental health setting.
METHODS/DESIGN
METHODS
This study will utilize a mixed methods design incorporating qualitative focus group interviews and cross-sectional survey. Our process will begin with the hiring of a youth peer research partner who will provide lived experience expertise through all phases of the study. We will advertise, recruit, and conduct four focus groups with youth who receive services from the Foundry Vancouver Granville located in British Columbia, Canada. In the first two focus groups, we will recruit youth aged 15-18 years (n = 10). In the second two focus groups, we will recruit young adults aged 19-24 years (n = 10). In parallel, we will conduct a cross-sectional survey of the recovery and mental health needs of youth, informed by ten widely used and validated PROM. Thematic analysis techniques will guide the identification of predominant thematic trends in the qualitative focus group data. We will use Classical and Rasch measurement methods to test and analyze the reliability and validity of selected PROM measures for youth populations.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed study has the potential to produce a preliminary conceptual and measurement model for understanding the mental health and recovery needs of youth with mental health disorders. This evidence will inform how youth mental health services can grow, support, and sustain the capacity for a collaborative, interdisciplinary and innovative patient-oriented research environment. Findings will also contribute much needed evidence to improve the standard of care for youth who experience mental health disorders in Canada and beyond.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30733825
doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0264-0
pii: 264
pmc: PMC6354405
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6Références
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Dec;25(6):494-7
pubmed: 11824981
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
pubmed: 12214795
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201
pubmed: 15550799
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602
pubmed: 15939837
Psychol Assess. 2006 Mar;18(1):62-70
pubmed: 16594813
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 May;57(5):640-5
pubmed: 16675756
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Evid Based Med. 2006 Dec;11(6):184
pubmed: 17213178
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Oct;43(5):459-80
pubmed: 17514504
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74
pubmed: 18388841
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(3):157-60
pubmed: 19462299
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):342-50
pubmed: 20033773
Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):887-97
pubmed: 20401552
Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):875-86
pubmed: 20405245
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2093-102
pubmed: 21652063
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Oct;11(5):571-85
pubmed: 21958102
Lancet. 2012 Apr 28;379(9826):1641-52
pubmed: 22538179
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):456-64
pubmed: 22593009
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Oct 30;199(3):169-73
pubmed: 22698261
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Jan;54:s30-5
pubmed: 23288499
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2013 Jan;54:s5-10
pubmed: 23288502
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57279
pubmed: 23468955
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 May;7(2):103-8
pubmed: 23617573
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Feb;46(2):165-73
pubmed: 23994048
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20
pubmed: 24497237
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Feb;11 Suppl 2:S112-7
pubmed: 24559023
J Rheumatol. 2014 May;41(5):1011-5
pubmed: 24584919
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;9(6):487-97
pubmed: 24673851
World Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;13(2):118-24
pubmed: 24890055
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 May;59(5):243-9
pubmed: 25007277
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):126-36
pubmed: 25155813
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e112077
pubmed: 25397902
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):67-75
pubmed: 25439733
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 02;5(6):e007079
pubmed: 26038353
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Dec;38(4):349-58
pubmed: 26075526
Healthc Q. 2016;18 Spec No:27-31
pubmed: 26854545
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 01;14:33
pubmed: 26927364
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2383-401
pubmed: 27174305
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):e679
pubmed: 27200241
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Oct 1;67(10):1083-1090
pubmed: 27247178
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):792-800
pubmed: 27357634
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):870-886
pubmed: 27910173
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486
pubmed: 28292494
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49
pubmed: 29433611
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7
pubmed: 3204199
Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):459-65
pubmed: 7667457
J Pers Assess. 1993 Jun;60(3):532-42
pubmed: 8336268