Comparative evaluation of chlorpyrifos exposure estimates from whole-body dermal dosimetry and urinary trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) methods.


Journal

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
ISSN: 1090-2414
Titre abrégé: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7805381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2019
Historique:
received: 03 07 2018
revised: 20 01 2019
accepted: 24 01 2019
pubmed: 9 2 2019
medline: 3 5 2019
entrez: 9 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chlorpyrifos is one of the most widely used organophosphate pesticides and has a record of adverse effects on applicators. Assessment of exposure to chlorpyrifos based on its urinary metabolite, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP), is considered as the most accurate. However, urine sampling can be difficult, and the laboratory analytical procedures involved are complex and expensive. A simpler approach for assessing pesticide exposure among applicators is the whole-body dermal dosimetry method, but this needs validation. The objective of this study was to compare chlorpyrifos exposure estimates obtained separately with the urinary TCP and the whole-body dermal dosimetry methods from applicators. Exposure estimates from the whole-body dermal dosimetry method (5-29 μg/kg/day) showed less variation than those from the urinary TCP method (1-71 μg/kg/day), but both were in close agreement at the mean level (16 μg/kg/day and 15 μg/kg/day, respectively). The whole-body dermal dosimetry method is therefore valid for providing estimates of the typical levels of pesticide exposure among applicators in situations where the urinary TCP method cannot be applied.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30735976
pii: S0147-6513(19)30108-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.077
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Insecticides 0
Pyridones 0
3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol 6515-38-4
Chlorpyrifos JCS58I644W

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

439-443

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Albert Atabila (A)

Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessel Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia. Electronic address: albert.atabila@griffithuni.edu.au.

Dung Tri Phung (DT)

Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessel Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Ross Sadler (R)

Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessel Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Des Connell (D)

Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessel Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Cordia Chu (C)

Centre for Environment and Population Health, Griffith School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessel Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH