Clinical effect and cost-effectiveness of incorporation of point-of-care assays into early infant HIV diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe: a modelling study.
Journal
The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
01
06
2018
revised:
07
11
2018
accepted:
08
11
2018
pubmed:
10
2
2019
medline:
26
5
2020
entrez:
10
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
New point-of-care (POC) assays for early infant HIV diagnosis are costlier than conventional total nucleic acid assays, but could increase access to testing, shorten time to results, and expedite initiation of antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of incorporating these POC assays into early infant diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe. We used the Cost Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC)-Pediatric model to examine the clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of replacing conventional assays for early infant HIV diagnosis with POC assays at age 6 weeks in Zimbabwe. We simulated two strategies for early infant HIV diagnosis: conventional and POC. Modelled assays differed in sensitivity; specificity; time to, and probability of, return of results; and cost. Model outcomes included survival, life expectancy, and mean lifetime per-person treatment cost, which were reported separately for all HIV-exposed infants and all infants with HIV. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with discounted (3% per year) costs and life expectancy from a health-care system perspective for all HIV-exposed infants. We judged incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1010 (Zimbabwe's annual gross domestic product per person) or less per year of life saved to be cost-effective. When conventional assays were used for early infant diagnosis, projected undiscounted life expectancy was 22·7 years for infants with HIV and 62·5 years for all HIV-exposed infants, at a cost of $610 per HIV-exposed infant. Use of POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis improved projected undiscounted life expectancy to 25·5 years among infants with HIV and 62·6 years among HIV-exposed infants at a cost of $690 per HIV-exposed infant. At age 12 weeks, survival among all infants with HIV was 76·1% with the conventional testing strategy and 83·5% with the POC testing strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of POC assays versus conventional assays for early infant diagnosis was $680 per year of life saved. When conventional assay characteristics remained constant, this ratio remained under the cost-effectiveness threshold as long as the specificity and sensitivity of the POC assay were greater than 92% and 65%, respectively. Our results were robust to plausible variations in POC assay cost, the probability of ART initiation, and probability of return of the results of POC testing. Compared with conventional assays, POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis in Zimbabwe will improve survival, extend life expectancy, and be cost-effective for HIV-exposed infants. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Unitaid.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
New point-of-care (POC) assays for early infant HIV diagnosis are costlier than conventional total nucleic acid assays, but could increase access to testing, shorten time to results, and expedite initiation of antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of incorporating these POC assays into early infant diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe.
METHODS
We used the Cost Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC)-Pediatric model to examine the clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of replacing conventional assays for early infant HIV diagnosis with POC assays at age 6 weeks in Zimbabwe. We simulated two strategies for early infant HIV diagnosis: conventional and POC. Modelled assays differed in sensitivity; specificity; time to, and probability of, return of results; and cost. Model outcomes included survival, life expectancy, and mean lifetime per-person treatment cost, which were reported separately for all HIV-exposed infants and all infants with HIV. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with discounted (3% per year) costs and life expectancy from a health-care system perspective for all HIV-exposed infants. We judged incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $1010 (Zimbabwe's annual gross domestic product per person) or less per year of life saved to be cost-effective.
FINDINGS
When conventional assays were used for early infant diagnosis, projected undiscounted life expectancy was 22·7 years for infants with HIV and 62·5 years for all HIV-exposed infants, at a cost of $610 per HIV-exposed infant. Use of POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis improved projected undiscounted life expectancy to 25·5 years among infants with HIV and 62·6 years among HIV-exposed infants at a cost of $690 per HIV-exposed infant. At age 12 weeks, survival among all infants with HIV was 76·1% with the conventional testing strategy and 83·5% with the POC testing strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of POC assays versus conventional assays for early infant diagnosis was $680 per year of life saved. When conventional assay characteristics remained constant, this ratio remained under the cost-effectiveness threshold as long as the specificity and sensitivity of the POC assay were greater than 92% and 65%, respectively. Our results were robust to plausible variations in POC assay cost, the probability of ART initiation, and probability of return of the results of POC testing.
INTERPRETATION
Compared with conventional assays, POC assays for early infant HIV diagnosis in Zimbabwe will improve survival, extend life expectancy, and be cost-effective for HIV-exposed infants.
FUNDING
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and Unitaid.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30737187
pii: S2352-3018(18)30328-X
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30328-X
pmc: PMC6408227
mid: NIHMS1521113
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e182-e190Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD079214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R37 AI093269
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI093269
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : T32 AI007422
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI058736
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R37 AI058736
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet. 2004 Oct 2-8;364(9441):1236-43
pubmed: 15464184
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Jan;27(1):22-6
pubmed: 18162933
BMC Med. 2011 May 20;9:59
pubmed: 21599888
AIDS. 2013 Jun 1;27(9):1483-92
pubmed: 23462219
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 13;8(12):e83389
pubmed: 24349503
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Sep 1;67(1):e1-4
pubmed: 24933096
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 16;11(9):e1001725
pubmed: 25225800
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152672
pubmed: 27032094
PLoS One. 2016 May 13;11(5):e0155256
pubmed: 27175484
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158303
pubmed: 27391129
J Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 1;214(9):1319-1328
pubmed: 27540110
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 29;3(3):ofw161
pubmed: 27704016
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935
pubmed: 27987642
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169497
pubmed: 28060886
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Aug 15;75(5):e128-e131
pubmed: 28350554
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jul 1;75(3):308-314
pubmed: 28418986
AIDS. 2017 Sep 24;31(15):2135-2145
pubmed: 28906279
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 21;14(11):e1002446
pubmed: 29161262
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):701-707
pubmed: 29490026
AIDS. 2018 Jul 17;32(11):1453-1463
pubmed: 29746301
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):380-6
pubmed: 9691106