Robotic cochlear implantation: feasibility of a multiport approach in an ex vivo model.
Cochlear implantation
Electrode insertion
Multiport surgery
Robotic surgery
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
04
10
2018
accepted:
29
01
2019
pubmed:
11
2
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
entrez:
11
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A recent clinical trial has shown the feasibility of robotic cochlear implantation. The electrode was inserted through the robotically drilled tunnel and an additional access through the external auditory canal was created to provide for means of visualization and manipulation. To obviate the need for this additional access, the utilization of multiple robotically drilled tunnels targeting the round window has been proposed. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of electrode insertion through a robotic multiport approach. In four ex vivo human head specimens (left side), four trajectories through the facial recess (2x) and the retrofacial and suprameatal region were planned and robotically drilled. Optimal three-port configurations were determined for each specimen by analyzing combinations of three of the four trajectories, where the three trajectories were used for the electrode, endoscopic visualization and manipulative assistance. Finally, electrode insertions were conducted through the optimal configurations. The electrodes could successfully be inserted, and the procedure sufficiently visualized through the facial recess drill tunnels in all specimens. Effective manipulative assistance for sealing the round window could be provided through the retrofacial tunnel. Electrode insertion through a robotic three-port approach is feasible. Drill tunnels through the facial recess for the electrode and endoscope allow for optimized insertion angles and sufficient visualization. Through a retrofacial tunnel effective manipulation for sealing is possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30739180
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05318-7
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05318-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1283-1289Références
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;266(7):955-60
pubmed: 19015866
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):722-30
pubmed: 20147866
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1284-90
pubmed: 23921934
Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):1915-22
pubmed: 24272427
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:379295
pubmed: 25101276
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:596498
pubmed: 25101289
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;137(4):447-454
pubmed: 28145157
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):759-764
pubmed: 28196000
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 May;12(5):889-895
pubmed: 28197759
Sci Robot. 2017 Mar 15;2(4):null
pubmed: 30246168
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jun;129(6):1458-1461
pubmed: 30582165