A clinical practice-based evaluation of the RIETE score in predicting occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism.
Occult cancer
Risk factor
Risk score
Screening strategy
Venous thromboembolism
Journal
Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis
ISSN: 1573-742X
Titre abrégé: J Thromb Thrombolysis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9502018
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
11
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
11
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and occult cancer is well established. However, the benefit of cancer screening in all VTE patients remains controversial. The Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) score is a recently proposed risk score to identify VTE patients at high risk of occult cancer. We evaluated the performance of the RIETE score in a routine clinical setting comprising patients presenting with VTE between January 1 and December 31, 2014, at Danderyd University hospital. Out of 488 VTE patients, 47 (9.6%) patients received a new cancer diagnosis during a 24-month follow-up. After exclusion of patients with cancer diagnosed at baseline (≤ 10 days after VTE, n = 16), 472 patients were considered eligible for cancer screening. Among these 472 patients, 31 (6.6%) received a cancer diagnosis during follow-up. The cumulative incidence was high after both unprovoked (8.5%) and provoked (4.8%) VTE. The RIETE score was evaluated in 467 of these patients. Interestingly, a high RIETE score was not significantly associated with cancer diagnosis during follow-up (OR 1.78; 95% CI 0.85-3.63), which was mainly due to a poor performance in women (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.30-2.83). In summary, we observed a relatively high incidence of occult cancer in both unprovoked and provoked VTE. The RIETE score performed poorly in identifying patients at high risk of occult cancer in our VTE population. Additional risk assessment models are warranted to identify VTE patients who would benefit from extensive cancer screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30739306
doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01822-z
pii: 10.1007/s11239-019-01822-z
pmc: PMC6556156
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111-118Références
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Sep 2;149(5):323-33
pubmed: 18765702
Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72
pubmed: 19762550
J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Jan;9(1):79-84
pubmed: 20946181
PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001275
pubmed: 22859911
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1404-13
pubmed: 23146958
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jul 22;13:352
pubmed: 23875619
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):697-704
pubmed: 26095467
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):193-199
pubmed: 26672686
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2302-2311
pubmed: 27056738
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jul;14(7):1480-3
pubmed: 27428935
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Jan;43(1):68-73
pubmed: 27522504
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016 Nov;42(8):884-890
pubmed: 27764880
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):564-571
pubmed: 27815153
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr;24(3):489-495
pubmed: 28681634
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):410-417
pubmed: 28828492
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):2076-2079
pubmed: 28851126
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Nov;15(11):2184-2187
pubmed: 28875565
Thromb Res. 2018 Apr;164:79-84
pubmed: 29522910
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194673
pubmed: 29558509
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jul;118(7):1270-1278
pubmed: 29864787