Remote Programming of Cochlear Implants.
Journal
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
entrez:
12
2
2019
pubmed:
12
2
2019
medline:
26
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of remote programming of cochlear implants. Single-subject design SETTING:: Four North American clinical sites PATIENTS:: Forty cochlear implant recipients aged 12 years or older INTERVENTION:: Subjects had their cochlear implants programmed at a location that was remote from their audiologist using telecommunication with and without the support of a facilitator. Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale-C (SSQ-C) were compared using the subject's in-office MAP (program) and MAPs programmed remotely with and without the assistance of a facilitator. Additional subjective preference data were gathered from subjects and audiologists via questionnaires. MAPs programmed via the three different models did not yield significantly different group mean CNC word scores. No device/procedure-related adverse events occurred. SSQ-C questionnaire results indicated that recipients received similar subjective benefit from familiar in-office, remote-facilitated, and remote-unassisted MAPs. Remote programming is an effective means of cochlear implant service delivery. The practice was approved by the FDA on November 17, 2017 supported by the results of this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30741905
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002119
pii: 00129492-201903000-00037
pmc: PMC6380526
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e260-e266Références
Telemed J E Health. 2008 Dec;14(10):1101-17
pubmed: 19119834
Psychol Sci. 2000 Mar;11(2):153-8
pubmed: 11273423
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:461-4
pubmed: 21756673
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):732-740
pubmed: 28257529
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):507-18
pubmed: 713519
Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99
pubmed: 15035561
J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Mar 27;20(4):171-177
pubmed: 24675003
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Aug;55(4):1112-27
pubmed: 22232388
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):258-64
pubmed: 24493769
Otol Neurotol. 2005 Mar;26(2):188-95
pubmed: 15793403
J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70
pubmed: 14485785
Codas. 2014 Nov-Dec;26(6):481-6
pubmed: 25590911
Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Jul;134(7):709-16
pubmed: 24773208
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1035-40
pubmed: 20147864
Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;130(12):1379-88
pubmed: 20586675
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jul;19(7):557-64
pubmed: 23705961
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):533-40
pubmed: 18649152
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:489-92
pubmed: 21756680
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):508-22
pubmed: 9228814