The incidence of post-intubation hypertension and association with repeated intubation attempts in the emergency department.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
02
2018
accepted:
29
01
2019
entrez:
12
2
2019
pubmed:
12
2
2019
medline:
12
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies in the non-emergency department (ED) settings have reported the relationships of post-intubation hypertension with poor patient outcomes. While ED-based studies have examined post-intubation hypotension and its sequelae, little is known about, post-intubation hypertension and its risk factors in the ED settings. In this context, we aimed to identify the incidence of post-intubation hypertension in the ED, and to test the hypothesis that repeated intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of post-intubation hypertension. This study is a secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter prospective observational study of emergency intubations in 15 EDs from 2012 through 2016. The analytic cohort comprised all adult non-cardiac-arrest patients undergoing orotracheal intubation without pre-intubation hypotension. The primary exposure was the repeated intubation attempts, defined as ≥2 laryngoscopic attempts. The outcome was post-intubation hypertension defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure (sBP) of >20% along with a post-intubation sBP of >160 mmHg. To investigate the association of repeated intubation attempts with the risk of post-intubation hypertension, we fit multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for ten potential confounders and patient clustering within the EDs. Of 3,097 patients, the median age was 69 years, 1,977 (64.0%) were men, and 991 (32.0%) underwent repeated intubation attempts. Post-intubation hypertension was observed in 276 (8.9%). In the unadjusted model, the incidence of post-intubation hypertension did not differ between the patients with single intubation attempt and those with repeated attempts (8.5% versus 9.8%, unadjusted P = 0.24). By contrast, after adjusting for potential confounders and patient clustering in the random-effects model, the patients who underwent repeated intubation attempts had a significantly higher risk of post-intubation hypertension (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.18; adjusted P = 0.01). We found that 8.9% of patients developed post-intubation hypertension, and that repeated intubation attempts were significantly associated with a significantly higher risk of post-intubation hypertension in the ED.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Studies in the non-emergency department (ED) settings have reported the relationships of post-intubation hypertension with poor patient outcomes. While ED-based studies have examined post-intubation hypotension and its sequelae, little is known about, post-intubation hypertension and its risk factors in the ED settings. In this context, we aimed to identify the incidence of post-intubation hypertension in the ED, and to test the hypothesis that repeated intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of post-intubation hypertension.
METHODS
This study is a secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter prospective observational study of emergency intubations in 15 EDs from 2012 through 2016. The analytic cohort comprised all adult non-cardiac-arrest patients undergoing orotracheal intubation without pre-intubation hypotension. The primary exposure was the repeated intubation attempts, defined as ≥2 laryngoscopic attempts. The outcome was post-intubation hypertension defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure (sBP) of >20% along with a post-intubation sBP of >160 mmHg. To investigate the association of repeated intubation attempts with the risk of post-intubation hypertension, we fit multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for ten potential confounders and patient clustering within the EDs.
RESULTS
Of 3,097 patients, the median age was 69 years, 1,977 (64.0%) were men, and 991 (32.0%) underwent repeated intubation attempts. Post-intubation hypertension was observed in 276 (8.9%). In the unadjusted model, the incidence of post-intubation hypertension did not differ between the patients with single intubation attempt and those with repeated attempts (8.5% versus 9.8%, unadjusted P = 0.24). By contrast, after adjusting for potential confounders and patient clustering in the random-effects model, the patients who underwent repeated intubation attempts had a significantly higher risk of post-intubation hypertension (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11-2.18; adjusted P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
We found that 8.9% of patients developed post-intubation hypertension, and that repeated intubation attempts were significantly associated with a significantly higher risk of post-intubation hypertension in the ED.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30742676
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212170
pii: PONE-D-18-05325
pmc: PMC6370241
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0212170Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Jan 16;23:5
pubmed: 25700237
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):618-23
pubmed: 22483540
Resuscitation. 2017 May;114:14-20
pubmed: 28219617
Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):42-8
pubmed: 21150574
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Oct;73(4):537-9
pubmed: 7999498
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155566
pubmed: 27171225
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):53-6
pubmed: 8017307
Neurol Res. 1989 Dec;11(4):245-8
pubmed: 2576109
J Intensive Care Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):157-65
pubmed: 17562739
J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;41(4):347-54
pubmed: 20434289
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):749-754.e2
pubmed: 22542734
CJEM. 2012 Mar;14(2):74-82
pubmed: 22554438
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):129-34
pubmed: 26973736
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;6(1):1-2
pubmed: 9928967
West J Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;9(4):190-4
pubmed: 19561743
Anesthesiology. 1977 Oct;47(4):381-4
pubmed: 900548
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):911-4
pubmed: 9758305
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1492-6
pubmed: 26166379
Anaesthesia. 2002 Apr;57(4):330-3
pubmed: 11939990
Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1406-13
pubmed: 21627630
Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents
pubmed: 15271750
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 25;21:58
pubmed: 23883447
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):480-4, table of contents
pubmed: 12145076
J Clin Anesth. 2005 Jun;17(4):255-62
pubmed: 15950848
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1171-6
pubmed: 9620498
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):363-370.e1
pubmed: 25533140
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1984 Jul-Aug;(4):58-60
pubmed: 6495956
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-8
pubmed: 23574475
J Clin Anesth. 2004 Nov;16(7):508-16
pubmed: 15590254
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Jul;35(5):442-7
pubmed: 1887747
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Oct;29(5):499-508
pubmed: 28582801
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1500-4
pubmed: 23911630
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Sep;55(9):855-60
pubmed: 6615672
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Apr;74(4):1074-80
pubmed: 23511147
J Anesth. 2005;19(4):282-6
pubmed: 16261464
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):781-6
pubmed: 25552546
Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):428-33
pubmed: 22155701