Implementation of gestational weight gain guidelines - what's more effective for ensuring weight recording in pregnancy?


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 09 04 2018
accepted: 21 12 2018
entrez: 13 2 2019
pubmed: 13 2 2019
medline: 4 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pregnant women who gain weight in accordance with guidelines have the lowest risk of pregnancy and birth-related complications. However, evidence-practice gaps often exist. To address pregnancy weight management barriers, a stepped implementation science approach was used, comprising targeted in-services, provision of scales for clinic rooms, and changes to routine weight recording in a hospital electronic medical record. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative influence of evidence-based interventions on staff's compliance to recording of antenatal weights. Retrospective data analysis of weight recording over three 15-month cohorts across April 2014-December 2017. Variables calculated from data included: proportion of women with weight recorded at booking and proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit. Generalised estimating equation modelling was used to examine differences in weight recording compliance rates between cohorts, pre-pregnancy body mass index categories, model of care and clinicians. There were approximately 13,000 pregnancies in each cohort. The proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit per cohort differed significantly between cohorts from 4.2% (baseline), 18.9% (scales and in-services) to 61.8% (medical record prompts), p < 0.001. Significant improvements were achieved through systematic barrier analysis and subsequent mapping and implementation of appropriate and effective interventions. Improvements were observed across the entire service, in all models of care with all professional groups demonstrating increased recording of weights.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnant women who gain weight in accordance with guidelines have the lowest risk of pregnancy and birth-related complications. However, evidence-practice gaps often exist. To address pregnancy weight management barriers, a stepped implementation science approach was used, comprising targeted in-services, provision of scales for clinic rooms, and changes to routine weight recording in a hospital electronic medical record. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative influence of evidence-based interventions on staff's compliance to recording of antenatal weights.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective data analysis of weight recording over three 15-month cohorts across April 2014-December 2017. Variables calculated from data included: proportion of women with weight recorded at booking and proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit. Generalised estimating equation modelling was used to examine differences in weight recording compliance rates between cohorts, pre-pregnancy body mass index categories, model of care and clinicians.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were approximately 13,000 pregnancies in each cohort. The proportion of women who had a weight recorded at each visit per cohort differed significantly between cohorts from 4.2% (baseline), 18.9% (scales and in-services) to 61.8% (medical record prompts), p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Significant improvements were achieved through systematic barrier analysis and subsequent mapping and implementation of appropriate and effective interventions. Improvements were observed across the entire service, in all models of care with all professional groups demonstrating increased recording of weights.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30744580
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2162-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-018-2162-x
pmc: PMC6371612
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19

Références

Med J Aust. 2004 Mar 15;180(6 Suppl):S57-60
pubmed: 15012583
BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):460
pubmed: 1547413
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Mar;11(2):137-44
pubmed: 17066316
Intern Med J. 2007 Sep;37(9):647-50
pubmed: 17714205
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD001096
pubmed: 19588323
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38
pubmed: 22531013
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:35
pubmed: 22531601
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):995-1001
pubmed: 22717261
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 27;12:102
pubmed: 23013446
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Dec;52(6):545-51
pubmed: 23113826
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 19;12:131
pubmed: 23157894
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Dec;52(6):588-92
pubmed: 23216325
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 20;13:115
pubmed: 23688111
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 21;13:117
pubmed: 23692981
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;(7):CD005627
pubmed: 23881656
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):196-201
pubmed: 24881524
Implement Sci. 2014 May 01;9:51
pubmed: 24885553
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(2):263-70
pubmed: 26841341
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2):
pubmed: 26898847
J Pregnancy. 2016;2016:2049673
pubmed: 27446614
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Dec;41(6):646-664
pubmed: 28063462
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:95-101
pubmed: 28063622
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):36
pubmed: 28095821
Obes Rev. 2017 Apr;18(4):385-399
pubmed: 28177566
BJOG. 2017 Oct;124(11):1718-1728
pubmed: 28220604
JAMA. 2017 Jun 6;317(21):2207-2225
pubmed: 28586887
Women Birth. 2018 Aug;31(4):278-284
pubmed: 29137874
Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;75(4):372-380
pubmed: 30240104

Auteurs

Shelley Wilkinson (S)

Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Mater Health, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia. Shelley.wilkinson@mater.org.au.
Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Mothers, Babies and Women's Theme, Brisbane, 4101, Australia. Shelley.wilkinson@mater.org.au.
Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Mater Health, Brisbane, 4101, Australia. Shelley.wilkinson@mater.org.au.

Michael Beckmann (M)

Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Mothers, Babies and Women's Theme, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.
Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Mater Health, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.

Elin Donaldson (E)

Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Mater Health, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Mater Health, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.

Sally McCray (S)

Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Mater Health, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Mothers, Babies and Women's Theme, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH