Feature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically.
RDK
alpha
attentional sampling
brain oscillations
distributed attention
exploration
feature-based attention
microsaccades
perceptual cycles
random-dot kinetograms
theta
Journal
Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2019
18 02 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
revised:
05
12
2018
accepted:
07
01
2019
pubmed:
13
2
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
entrez:
13
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Attention supports the allocation of resources to relevant locations and objects in a scene. Under most conditions, several stimuli compete for neural representation. Attention biases neural representation toward the response associated with the attended object [1, 2]. Therefore, an attended stimulus enjoys a neural response that resembles the response to that stimulus in isolation. Factors that determine and generate attentional bias have been researched, ranging from endogenously controlled processes to exogenous capture of attention [1-4]. Recent studies investigate the temporal structure governing attention. When participants monitor a single location, visual-target detection depends on the phase of an ∼8-Hz brain rhythm [5, 6]. When two locations are monitored, performance fluctuates at 4 Hz for each location [7, 8]. The hypothesis is that 4-Hz sampling for two locations may reflect a common sampler that operates at 8 Hz globally, which is divided between relevant locations [5-7, 9]. The present study targets two properties of this phenomenon, called rhythmic-attentional sampling: first, sampling is typically described for selection over different locations. We examined whether rhythmic sampling is limited to selection over space or whether it extends to feature-based attention. Second, we examined whether sampling at 4 Hz results from the division of an 8-Hz rhythm over two objects. We found that two overlapping objects defined by features are sampled at ∼4 Hz per object. In addition, performance on a single object fluctuated at 8 Hz. Rhythmic sampling of features did not result from temporal structure in eye movements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30744973
pii: S0960-9822(19)30012-0
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
693-699.e4Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.