High extinction risk for wild coffee species and implications for coffee sector sustainability.


Journal

Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 07 09 2018
accepted: 19 12 2018
entrez: 13 2 2019
pubmed: 13 2 2019
medline: 22 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wild coffee species are critical for coffee crop development and, thus, for sustainability of global coffee production. Despite this fact, the extinction risk and conservation priority status of the world's coffee species are poorly known. Applying IUCN Red List of Threatened Species criteria to all (124) wild coffee species, we undertook a gap analysis for germplasm collections and protected areas and devised a crop wild relative (CWR) priority system. We found that at least 60% of all coffee species are threatened with extinction, 45% are not held in any germplasm collection, and 28% are not known to occur in any protected area. Existing conservation measures, including those for key coffee CWRs, are inadequate. We propose that wild coffee species are extinction sensitive, especially in an era of accelerated climatic change.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30746478
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3473
pii: aav3473
pmc: PMC6357749
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

eaav3473

Références

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47981
pubmed: 23144840
Zookeys. 2011;(150):117-26
pubmed: 22207809
Conserv Biol. 2013 Oct;27(5):1031-40
pubmed: 23772911
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Apr;109:351-361
pubmed: 28212875
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24528
pubmed: 21935419
Nat Plants. 2016 Mar 21;2:16022
pubmed: 27249561
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e103684
pubmed: 25075612
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21019
pubmed: 21731641
Nature. 2003 Sep 25;425(6956):343
pubmed: 14508457
Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Mar;261(2):259-66
pubmed: 10102360
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Feb;25(2):390-403
pubmed: 30650240
Food Chem. 2018 May 15;248:52-60
pubmed: 29329870
Nat Plants. 2017 Jun 19;3:17081
pubmed: 28628132
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(7):1565-83
pubmed: 17956855
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):531-539
pubmed: 27696559
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Nov 4;16(1):242
pubmed: 27814672
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Apr;14(4):1070-85
pubmed: 26311018
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791
pubmed: 29773750
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):290-4
pubmed: 22832582
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jul 16;9:167
pubmed: 19607674
Ann Bot. 2013 Feb;111(2):229-48
pubmed: 23275631
Am J Bot. 2007 Mar;94(3):313-29
pubmed: 21636404
Evol Appl. 2013 Feb;6(2):243-52
pubmed: 23798974
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0135152
pubmed: 26252495

Auteurs

Aaron P Davis (AP)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.

Helen Chadburn (H)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.

Justin Moat (J)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

Robert O'Sullivan (R)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.

Serene Hargreaves (S)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.

Eimear Nic Lughadha (E)

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.

Articles similaires

Systematic review of the quality of care provided to sick children in Ethiopian health facilities.

Negalign Berhanu Bayou, Biruk Hailu Tesfaye, Kassahun Alemu et al.
1.00
Humans Ethiopia Quality of Health Care Child Health Facilities
Humans Infant Female Male Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Ethiopia Conservation of Natural Resources Environmental Monitoring Soil Soil Erosion

Classifications MeSH