Evaluation of Self-Management Support Functions in Apps for People With Persistent Pain: Systematic Review.
chronic pain
culture
mHealth
self-management
smartphone
technology
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 02 2019
12 02 2019
Historique:
received:
10
12
2018
accepted:
13
01
2019
revised:
10
01
2019
entrez:
13
2
2019
pubmed:
13
2
2019
medline:
13
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Smartphone apps are a potential mechanism for development of self-management skills in people with persistent pain. However, the inclusion of best-practice content items in available pain management apps fostering core self-management skills for self-management support is not known. The aim of the study was to evaluate the contents of smartphone apps providing information on pain management strategies for people with persistent pain facilitating self-management support and to appraise the app quality. A systematic search was performed in the New Zealand App Store and Google Play Store. Apps were included if they were designed for people with persistent pain, provided information on pain self-management strategies, and were available in English. App contents were evaluated using an a priori 14-item self-management support (SMS-14) checklist. App quality was assessed using the 23-item Mobile Apps Rating Scale. Of the 939 apps screened, 19 apps met the inclusion criteria. Meditation and guided relaxation were the most frequently included self-management strategies. Overall, the included apps met a median of 4 (range 1-8) of the SMS-14 checklist. A total of 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) met the largest number of items (8 out of 14) to foster self-management of pain. Self-monitoring of symptoms (n=11) and self-tailoring of strategies (n=9) were frequently featured functions, whereas a few apps had features facilitating social support and enabling communicating with clinicians. No apps provided information tailored to the cultural needs of the user. The app quality mean scores using Mobile Apps Rating Scale ranged from 2.7 to 4.5 (out of 5.0). Although use of 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) has been shown to improve health outcomes, none of the included apps have been evaluated in people with persistent pain. Of the 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) that met the largest number of items to support skills in self-management of pain, 2 apps (PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach and SuperBetter) were free, suggesting the potential for using apps as a scalable, wide-reaching intervention to complement face-to-face care. However, none provided culturally tailored information. Although 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) were validated to show improved health outcomes, none were tested in people with persistent pain. Both users and clinicians should be aware of such limitations and make informed choices in using or recommending apps as a self-management tool. For better integration of apps in clinical practice, concerted efforts are required among app developers, clinicians, and people with persistent pain in developing apps and evaluating for clinical efficacy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Smartphone apps are a potential mechanism for development of self-management skills in people with persistent pain. However, the inclusion of best-practice content items in available pain management apps fostering core self-management skills for self-management support is not known.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to evaluate the contents of smartphone apps providing information on pain management strategies for people with persistent pain facilitating self-management support and to appraise the app quality.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in the New Zealand App Store and Google Play Store. Apps were included if they were designed for people with persistent pain, provided information on pain self-management strategies, and were available in English. App contents were evaluated using an a priori 14-item self-management support (SMS-14) checklist. App quality was assessed using the 23-item Mobile Apps Rating Scale.
RESULTS
Of the 939 apps screened, 19 apps met the inclusion criteria. Meditation and guided relaxation were the most frequently included self-management strategies. Overall, the included apps met a median of 4 (range 1-8) of the SMS-14 checklist. A total of 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) met the largest number of items (8 out of 14) to foster self-management of pain. Self-monitoring of symptoms (n=11) and self-tailoring of strategies (n=9) were frequently featured functions, whereas a few apps had features facilitating social support and enabling communicating with clinicians. No apps provided information tailored to the cultural needs of the user. The app quality mean scores using Mobile Apps Rating Scale ranged from 2.7 to 4.5 (out of 5.0). Although use of 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) has been shown to improve health outcomes, none of the included apps have been evaluated in people with persistent pain.
CONCLUSIONS
Of the 3 apps (Curable, PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach, and SuperBetter) that met the largest number of items to support skills in self-management of pain, 2 apps (PainScale-Pain Diary and Coach and SuperBetter) were free, suggesting the potential for using apps as a scalable, wide-reaching intervention to complement face-to-face care. However, none provided culturally tailored information. Although 2 apps (Headspace and SuperBetter) were validated to show improved health outcomes, none were tested in people with persistent pain. Both users and clinicians should be aware of such limitations and make informed choices in using or recommending apps as a self-management tool. For better integration of apps in clinical practice, concerted efforts are required among app developers, clinicians, and people with persistent pain in developing apps and evaluating for clinical efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30747715
pii: v7i2e13080
doi: 10.2196/13080
pmc: PMC6390192
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13080Informations de copyright
©Hemakumar Devan, Devin Farmery, Lucy Peebles, Rebecca Grainger. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 12.02.2019.
Références
Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(1):5-31
pubmed: 26818413
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Feb 17;12(1):e4
pubmed: 20164043
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321-32
pubmed: 12605954
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 02;(9):CD000963
pubmed: 25180773
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Br J Pain. 2016 Aug;10(3):135-40
pubmed: 27583140
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
Pain Med. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):471-484
pubmed: 28541464
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2017 Jun 30;1(1):rkx002
pubmed: 31431942
Eur J Pain. 2012 Jan;16(1):93-104
pubmed: 21705246
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Apr;24(3 Suppl):68-79
pubmed: 12668199
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):300-7
pubmed: 15893212
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624
pubmed: 17592957
Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2630-7
pubmed: 25267209
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7
pubmed: 12867348
J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13
pubmed: 26051220
Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-7
pubmed: 25844555
Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):321-8
pubmed: 26588691
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259
pubmed: 28919117
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1;129(5):406-11
pubmed: 9735069
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(6):308-12
pubmed: 21844177
Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):381-397
pubmed: 29669089
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;30(3):483-502
pubmed: 27886943
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 20;19(7):e256
pubmed: 28729237
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 May 16;2(2):e24
pubmed: 25099752
Pain Med. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):2070-2080
pubmed: 28087847
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(5):1584-1593
pubmed: 30294390
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:67-74
pubmed: 27573313
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1037-1049
pubmed: 29103548
J Pain. 2009 Dec;10(12):1187-204
pubmed: 19944378
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):1009-17
pubmed: 18576310
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):4-7
pubmed: 24914071
Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):461-8
pubmed: 23247005
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1098-1109
pubmed: 29103552
J Pain. 2008 Apr;9(4):373-9
pubmed: 18203665
Pain. 2016 Jan;157(1):65-9
pubmed: 26307855
Clin J Pain. 2017 Aug;33(8):676-686
pubmed: 27898460
Clin J Pain. 2015 Jun;31(6):557-63
pubmed: 25370138
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 09;16(4):e104
pubmed: 24718852
Games Health J. 2015 Jun;4(3):235-46
pubmed: 26182069
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 25;14:646
pubmed: 24965805
Pain. 2012 Feb;153(2):319-30
pubmed: 22133450
Pain Manag. 2016;6(1):75-88
pubmed: 26678703
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):488-498
pubmed: 28570436
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
Pain Med. 2014 Aug;15(8):1434-5
pubmed: 25040764
BMC Med. 2012 Nov 22;10:144
pubmed: 23171675
Med J Aust. 2012 Apr 2;196(6):386-90
pubmed: 22471539
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 25;11:97
pubmed: 25059981