Outcomes of sinonasal inverted papilloma resection by surgical approach: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

International forum of allergy & rhinology
ISSN: 2042-6984
Titre abrégé: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101550261

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 19 09 2018
revised: 20 12 2018
accepted: 08 01 2019
pubmed: 13 2 2019
medline: 26 3 2020
entrez: 13 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Selecting the optimal surgical approach for resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP) remains a challenge, with endoscopic, external, and combined approaches being utilized. This systematic review was conducted as an update to a 2006 systematic review to determine the preferred surgical approach for tumor control. The study protocol was developed a priori following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) process. Data were collected and outcomes were analyzed according to surgical approach and sites of tumor involvement. A total of 96 papers and 4134 SIP patients were included. The overall recurrence rate was 12.80% (322/2515) for the endoscopic approach group, 16.58% (182/1098) for the external approach group, and 12.60% (65/516) for the combined approach group. Meta-analysis by random effects model showed that the summarized risk ratio (RR) of recurrence was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.85, p = 0.003), I An enlarging and maturing body of literature continues to indicate that endoscopic approaches result in significantly lower recurrence rates than open approaches for surgical resection of SIP.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Selecting the optimal surgical approach for resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP) remains a challenge, with endoscopic, external, and combined approaches being utilized. This systematic review was conducted as an update to a 2006 systematic review to determine the preferred surgical approach for tumor control.
METHODS
The study protocol was developed a priori following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) process. Data were collected and outcomes were analyzed according to surgical approach and sites of tumor involvement.
RESULTS
A total of 96 papers and 4134 SIP patients were included. The overall recurrence rate was 12.80% (322/2515) for the endoscopic approach group, 16.58% (182/1098) for the external approach group, and 12.60% (65/516) for the combined approach group. Meta-analysis by random effects model showed that the summarized risk ratio (RR) of recurrence was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.85, p = 0.003), I
CONCLUSION
An enlarging and maturing body of literature continues to indicate that endoscopic approaches result in significantly lower recurrence rates than open approaches for surgical resection of SIP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30748098
doi: 10.1002/alr.22305
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

573-581

Informations de copyright

© 2019 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Auteurs

Rui Peng (R)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Andrew Thamboo (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Garret Choby (G)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Yifei Ma (Y)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Bing Zhou (B)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Peter H Hwang (PH)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH