Adult-onset Still's disease biological treatment strategy may depend on the phenotypic dichotomy.
Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cartilage, Articular
/ drug effects
Female
Hospitals, Community
Humans
Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
/ methods
Phenotype
Remission Induction
Retrospective Studies
Still's Disease, Adult-Onset
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Adult-onset Still’s disease
Anakinra
Biologics
Tocilizumab
Treatment strategy
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 02 2019
12 02 2019
Historique:
received:
27
08
2018
accepted:
30
01
2019
entrez:
14
2
2019
pubmed:
14
2
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) phenotype appears to be dichotomized in systemic or chronic articular forms. As biologicals and particularly interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 blockers play a more and more prominent role in the treatment, their place requires clarification. This study aimed to identify factors predictive of treatment response to anakinra or tocilizumab and investigate whether the choice of biotherapy and delays in the initiation of biotherapy influenced the likelihood of steroid discontinuation. A multicenter exploratory retrospective study included all patients diagnosed with AOSD and receiving biological treatments in three regional hospitals until 2018. Clinical and biological characteristics at diagnosis and treatment-related data were collected. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to perform univariate analysis for quantitative variables, and Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. Twenty-seven patients were included. All but one patient achieved remission with either anakinra or tocilizumab. Treatment responses depended on disease phenotype: the presence of arthritis and a chronic articular phenotype were associated with a substantial response to tocilizumab with p = 0.0009 (OR 36 [2.6-1703]) and p = 0.017 (OR 10 [1.22-92.6]), respectively, whereas the systemic form and the absence of arthritis were associated with a substantial response to anakinra with p = 0.0009 (OR 36 [2.6-1703]) and p = 0.017 (OR 10 [1.22-92.6]), respectively. Tocilizumab increased the likelihood of corticosteroid withdrawal (p = 0.029) regardless of delays in initiation or when it was initiated relative to other treatment in the overall therapeutic strategy. This study highlights the therapeutic implications of the phenotypic dichotomy of AOSD and should help us better codify AOSD treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30755262
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1838-6
pii: 10.1186/s13075-019-1838-6
pmc: PMC6373016
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein
0
tocilizumab
I031V2H011
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53Références
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):657-8
pubmed: 23622421
Mod Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;28(5):849-857
pubmed: 29251027
Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Oct;16(10):1016-1023
pubmed: 28778712
Cytokine. 2013 Feb;61(2):345-8
pubmed: 23276493
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Jun 17;13(3):R91
pubmed: 21682863
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Apr;66(4):642-6
pubmed: 24124073
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Dec;14(12):979-992
pubmed: 30324816
J Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Sep;17(6):315-7
pubmed: 21869709
Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Dec;80(6):653-5
pubmed: 23751410
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Feb 15;10:19
pubmed: 25758134
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Dec;40(12):1398-404
pubmed: 11752512
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Dec;77(12):1699-1701
pubmed: 29860231
J Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;20(2):121
pubmed: 24561423
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017 Nov;13(11):1089-1097
pubmed: 28870100
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):822-6
pubmed: 23225779
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S103-6
pubmed: 20842515
Clin Immunol. 2004 Jul;112(1):120-5
pubmed: 15207789
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Dec;49(12):2305-12
pubmed: 20837500
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Apr;30(2):222-238
pubmed: 27886796
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Feb;64(2):262-6
pubmed: 15184196
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 13;8:369
pubmed: 28659802
Reumatismo. 2016 Dec 16;68(3):159-162
pubmed: 27981819
Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;25(5):639-44
pubmed: 16365690
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Aug;62(8):2530-5
pubmed: 20506370
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):888-9
pubmed: 19917180
J Rheumatol. 2003 Nov;30(11):2422-7
pubmed: 14677188
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;66(6):1659-65
pubmed: 24515813
Rheumatol Int. 2012 May;32(5):1291-8
pubmed: 21274538
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Jul;13(7):708-22
pubmed: 24657513
Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Jul;54(7):587-90
pubmed: 7668903
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jan;32(1):141-7
pubmed: 23108887
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Mar;93(2):91-99
pubmed: 24646465
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):933-7
pubmed: 19032833
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Aug;65(8):1117-8
pubmed: 16837497
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Dec;77(12):1720-1729
pubmed: 30279267
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Jan;53(1):32-8
pubmed: 23864171
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):265-7
pubmed: 20483052
Immunol Res. 2015 Feb;61(1-2):53-62
pubmed: 25388963
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Nov;13(11):1149-59
pubmed: 25183244
Intern Med. 2011;50(16):1757-60
pubmed: 21841340
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Sep;49(9):1645-53
pubmed: 20472718
Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44(4):309-14
pubmed: 25656459
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1554
pubmed: 26426623
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jan 24;14:167-171
pubmed: 29416343
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Mar;67(3):302-8
pubmed: 17947302
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;77(6):840-847
pubmed: 29472362