Development of a novel tool to assess skills in laparoscopic gastrectomy using the Delphi method: the Japanese operative rating scale for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (JORS-LDG).
Assessment
Delphi
Gastrectomy
Laparoscopy
Surgical education
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
15
07
2018
accepted:
23
01
2019
pubmed:
14
2
2019
medline:
28
5
2020
entrez:
14
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assessment of the performance of laparoscopic gastrectomy is yet unreported, likely because of the complexity of the procedure. We aimed to develop a tool to assess the skills required for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) through cognitive task analysis (CTA) and expert consensus using the Delphi method. CTA involved the listing of the knowledge and criteria required for completing each step of LDG as subtasks based on interviews by experts and novices and text book, instructional video, and procedural review. The Delphi evaluation method involved anonymous online surveys, conducted to merge the opinions of experts in laparoscopic gastrectomy. The experts were asked to rate (from 1 to 5) the importance of subtasks for skill evaluation and training for LDG using a Likert scale. Consensus among expert viewpoints was determined by the internal consistency of each item using Cronbach's approach. Essential subtasks drafted for the assessment of LDG performance were determined based on the CTA. Thirty-one LDG experts participated in the online-survey with a response rate over 90%. A consensus was achieved after 2 rounds of surveys with a Cronbach alpha of 0.86, and 34 subtasks of LDG were selected. We finally created the Japanese Operative Rating Scale for Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (JORS-LDG) based on the 34 subtasks. We developed the JORS-LDG using CTA and the Delphi method.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Assessment of the performance of laparoscopic gastrectomy is yet unreported, likely because of the complexity of the procedure. We aimed to develop a tool to assess the skills required for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) through cognitive task analysis (CTA) and expert consensus using the Delphi method.
METHODS
CTA involved the listing of the knowledge and criteria required for completing each step of LDG as subtasks based on interviews by experts and novices and text book, instructional video, and procedural review. The Delphi evaluation method involved anonymous online surveys, conducted to merge the opinions of experts in laparoscopic gastrectomy. The experts were asked to rate (from 1 to 5) the importance of subtasks for skill evaluation and training for LDG using a Likert scale. Consensus among expert viewpoints was determined by the internal consistency of each item using Cronbach's approach.
RESULTS
Essential subtasks drafted for the assessment of LDG performance were determined based on the CTA. Thirty-one LDG experts participated in the online-survey with a response rate over 90%. A consensus was achieved after 2 rounds of surveys with a Cronbach alpha of 0.86, and 34 subtasks of LDG were selected. We finally created the Japanese Operative Rating Scale for Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (JORS-LDG) based on the 34 subtasks.
CONCLUSIONS
We developed the JORS-LDG using CTA and the Delphi method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30756172
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06681-6
pii: 10.1007/s00464-019-06681-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3945-3952Références
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):955-965.e8; quiz 1029-31, 1033
pubmed: 23490542
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19
pubmed: 27342689
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 15;151(6):e160428
pubmed: 27074114
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):346-53.e7
pubmed: 25026872
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2620-7
pubmed: 25480611
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2042-2049
pubmed: 28417229
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2489-503
pubmed: 22476826
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):616-23
pubmed: 19688400
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):118-26
pubmed: 22773236
Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):991-7
pubmed: 25994456
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1434-42
pubmed: 24106936
Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):54-61
pubmed: 21167366
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Oct;4(4):236-48
pubmed: 10623041
Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):468-74
pubmed: 26750607
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2763-71
pubmed: 24789129
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;25(3):479-86
pubmed: 20370726
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83
pubmed: 6380323
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(1):18-23
pubmed: 20095893
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3074-85
pubmed: 25669635
Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):251-9
pubmed: 20832048