Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.


Journal

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 22 09 2018
accepted: 16 01 2019
pubmed: 14 2 2019
medline: 15 4 2021
entrez: 14 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim was to compare the prognostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma(PHC). All patients with PHC between 2002 and 2014 were included. Imaging at the time of presentation was reassessed and clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) stage was determined according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system. Comparison of the prognostic accuracy was performed using the concordance index (c-index). A total of 248 PHC patients were included;45 patients(18.1%) underwent a curative-intent resection, whereas 203 patients(81.9%) did not because they were unfit for surgery or were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease during workup. Prognostic accuracy was comparable between the 7th and 8th editions (c-index 0.57 vs 0.58). For patients who underwent a curative-intent resection, the prognostic accuracy of the 8th edition (0.67) was higher than the 7th (0.65). For patients who did not undergo a curative-intent resection, the prognostic accuracy was poor in both the 7th as the 8th editions (0.54 vs 0.57). The 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system for PHC have comparable prognostic accuracy. Prognostic accuracy was particularly poor in unresectable patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The aim was to compare the prognostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma(PHC).
METHODS
All patients with PHC between 2002 and 2014 were included. Imaging at the time of presentation was reassessed and clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) stage was determined according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system. Comparison of the prognostic accuracy was performed using the concordance index (c-index).
RESULTS
A total of 248 PHC patients were included;45 patients(18.1%) underwent a curative-intent resection, whereas 203 patients(81.9%) did not because they were unfit for surgery or were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease during workup. Prognostic accuracy was comparable between the 7th and 8th editions (c-index 0.57 vs 0.58). For patients who underwent a curative-intent resection, the prognostic accuracy of the 8th edition (0.67) was higher than the 7th (0.65). For patients who did not undergo a curative-intent resection, the prognostic accuracy was poor in both the 7th as the 8th editions (0.54 vs 0.57).
CONCLUSION
The 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system for PHC have comparable prognostic accuracy. Prognostic accuracy was particularly poor in unresectable patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30756314
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04127-x
pii: 10.1007/s11605-019-04127-x
pmc: PMC7359130
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1612-1618

Références

HPB (Oxford). 2014 Dec;16(12):1074-82
pubmed: 25267346
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):79-88
pubmed: 24375300
World J Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;19(1):83-8
pubmed: 7740815
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1930-1935
pubmed: 26133967
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Dec;97(6):2333-8
pubmed: 15310748
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2179-86
pubmed: 22569746
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):277-84
pubmed: 22805862
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):507-17; discussion 517-9
pubmed: 11573044
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1930-1939.e3
pubmed: 28532698
HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(4):244-51
pubmed: 18333200
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Jan;20(1):83-92
pubmed: 28958483
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1881-90
pubmed: 25384902
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029

Auteurs

Marcia P Gaspersz (MP)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.gaspersz@erasmusmc.nl.

Stefan Buettner (S)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeroen L A van Vugt (JLA)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeroen de Jonge (J)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Wojciech G Polak (WG)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Michail Doukas (M)

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Jan N M Ijzermans (JNM)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Bas Groot Koerkamp (BG)

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.grootkoerkamp@erasmusmc.nl.

François E J A Willemssen (FEJA)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH