Effectiveness of a Behavior Change Technique-Based Smartphone Game to Improve Intrinsic Motivation and Physical Activity Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.
behavior change
exercise adherence
gamification
intrinsic motivation
mhealth
mobile phone game
physical activity
type 2 diabetes
Journal
JMIR serious games
ISSN: 2291-9279
Titre abrégé: JMIR Serious Games
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2019
13 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
10
07
2018
accepted:
09
12
2018
revised:
19
11
2018
entrez:
14
2
2019
pubmed:
14
2
2019
medline:
14
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Regular physical activity (PA) is an essential component of a successful type 2 diabetes treatment. However, despite the manifest evidence for the numerous health benefits of regular PA, most patients with type 2 diabetes remain inactive, often due to low motivation and lack of PA enjoyment. A recent and promising approach to help overcome these PA barriers and motivate inactive individuals to change their PA behavior is PA-promoting smartphone games. While short-term results of these games are encouraging, the long-term success in effectively changing PA behavior has to date not been confirmed. It is possible that an insufficient incorporation of motivational elements or flaws in gameplay and storyline in these games affect the long-term motivation to play and thereby prevent sustained changes in PA behavior. We aimed to address these design challenges by developing a PA-promoting smartphone game that incorporates established behavior change techniques and specifically targets inactive type 2 diabetes patients. To investigate if a self-developed, behavior change technique-based smartphone game designed by an interdisciplinary team is able to motivate inactive individuals with type 2 diabetes for regular use and thereby increase their intrinsic PA motivation. Thirty-six inactive, overweight type 2 diabetes patients (45-70 years of age) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (one-time lifestyle counseling). Participants were instructed to play the smartphone game or to implement the recommendations from the lifestyle counseling autonomously during the 24-week intervention period. Intrinsic PA motivation was assessed with an abridged 12-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) before and after the intervention. In addition, adherence to the game-proposed PA recommendations during the intervention period was assessed in the intervention group via the phone-recorded game usage data. Intrinsic PA motivation (IMI total score) increased significantly in the intervention group (+6.4 (SD 4.2; P<.001) points) while it decreased by 1.9 (SD 16.5; P=.623) points in the control group. The adjusted difference between both groups was 8.1 (95% CI 0.9, 15.4; P=.029) points. The subscales "interest/enjoyment" (+2.0 (SD 1.9) points, P<.001) and "perceived competence" (+2.4 (SD 2.4) points, P<.001) likewise increased significantly in the intervention group while they did not change significantly in the control group. The usage data revealed that participants in the intervention group used the game for an average of 131.1 (SD 48.7) minutes of in-game walking and for an average of 15.3 (SD 24.6) minutes of strength training per week. We found a significant positive association between total in-game training (min) and change in IMI total score (beta=0.0028; 95% CI 0.0007-0.0049; P=.01). In inactive individuals with type 2 diabetes, a novel smartphone game incorporating established motivational elements and personalized PA recommendations elicits significant increases in intrinsic PA motivation that are accompanied by de-facto improvements in PA adherence over 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02657018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02657018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Regular physical activity (PA) is an essential component of a successful type 2 diabetes treatment. However, despite the manifest evidence for the numerous health benefits of regular PA, most patients with type 2 diabetes remain inactive, often due to low motivation and lack of PA enjoyment. A recent and promising approach to help overcome these PA barriers and motivate inactive individuals to change their PA behavior is PA-promoting smartphone games. While short-term results of these games are encouraging, the long-term success in effectively changing PA behavior has to date not been confirmed. It is possible that an insufficient incorporation of motivational elements or flaws in gameplay and storyline in these games affect the long-term motivation to play and thereby prevent sustained changes in PA behavior. We aimed to address these design challenges by developing a PA-promoting smartphone game that incorporates established behavior change techniques and specifically targets inactive type 2 diabetes patients.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To investigate if a self-developed, behavior change technique-based smartphone game designed by an interdisciplinary team is able to motivate inactive individuals with type 2 diabetes for regular use and thereby increase their intrinsic PA motivation.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-six inactive, overweight type 2 diabetes patients (45-70 years of age) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group (one-time lifestyle counseling). Participants were instructed to play the smartphone game or to implement the recommendations from the lifestyle counseling autonomously during the 24-week intervention period. Intrinsic PA motivation was assessed with an abridged 12-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) before and after the intervention. In addition, adherence to the game-proposed PA recommendations during the intervention period was assessed in the intervention group via the phone-recorded game usage data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Intrinsic PA motivation (IMI total score) increased significantly in the intervention group (+6.4 (SD 4.2; P<.001) points) while it decreased by 1.9 (SD 16.5; P=.623) points in the control group. The adjusted difference between both groups was 8.1 (95% CI 0.9, 15.4; P=.029) points. The subscales "interest/enjoyment" (+2.0 (SD 1.9) points, P<.001) and "perceived competence" (+2.4 (SD 2.4) points, P<.001) likewise increased significantly in the intervention group while they did not change significantly in the control group. The usage data revealed that participants in the intervention group used the game for an average of 131.1 (SD 48.7) minutes of in-game walking and for an average of 15.3 (SD 24.6) minutes of strength training per week. We found a significant positive association between total in-game training (min) and change in IMI total score (beta=0.0028; 95% CI 0.0007-0.0049; P=.01).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In inactive individuals with type 2 diabetes, a novel smartphone game incorporating established motivational elements and personalized PA recommendations elicits significant increases in intrinsic PA motivation that are accompanied by de-facto improvements in PA adherence over 24 weeks.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02657018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02657018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30758293
pii: v7i1e11444
doi: 10.2196/11444
pmc: PMC6391647
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02657018']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11444Informations de copyright
©Christoph Höchsmann, Denis Infanger, Christopher Klenk, Karsten Königstein, Steffen P Walz, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (http://games.jmir.org), 13.02.2019.
Références
Soz Praventivmed. 1999;44(2):55-64
pubmed: 10407953
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4
pubmed: 11701584
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
pubmed: 12091180
Diabetes Care. 1992 Nov;15(11):1800-10
pubmed: 1468318
Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb;30(2):203-9
pubmed: 17259482
Am J Health Behav. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):570-82
pubmed: 18442337
J Behav Med. 2010 Apr;33(2):110-22
pubmed: 20012179
Diabet Med. 2010 Jan;27(1):79-84
pubmed: 20121893
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Mar;25(1):62-9
pubmed: 20384973
Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98
pubmed: 21678185
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59
pubmed: 21694556
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Jun;82(2):365-70
pubmed: 21699118
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:79
pubmed: 21798015
Lancet. 2011 Oct 1;378(9798):1244-53
pubmed: 21846575
J Obes. 2012;2012:752820
pubmed: 22187637
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):1005-33
pubmed: 22637741
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2895-905
pubmed: 22890825
Am J Manag Care. 2013 May;19(5):421-30
pubmed: 23781894
Int J Public Health. 2013 Dec;58(6):949-53
pubmed: 23974352
BMC Endocr Disord. 2013 Dec 10;13:57
pubmed: 24321337
Games Health J. 2013 Aug;2(4):183-190
pubmed: 24443708
Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):1016-23
pubmed: 24652727
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Mar;60(1):48-58
pubmed: 2489825
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 May-Jun;60(3):486-91
pubmed: 25661458
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Jun 29;11:361-71
pubmed: 26170686
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):130-8
pubmed: 26628415
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Mar;22(3):332-344
pubmed: 26952696
Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2065-2079
pubmed: 27926890
Diabetologia. 2017 Mar;60(3):499-507
pubmed: 27942799
BMJ. 2016 Dec 13;355:i6270
pubmed: 27965211
Trials. 2017 Mar 6;18(1):103
pubmed: 28264717
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jul;28(7):1818-1827
pubmed: 29460319
J Pers. 1994 Mar;62(1):119-42
pubmed: 8169757
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997 Mar;68(1):20-32
pubmed: 9094760