Detection of Milk Ejection Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy in Lactating Women during Milk Expression Using an Electric Breast Pump.
Bioimpedance
Breast
Lactation
Milk ejection
Journal
Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia
ISSN: 1573-7039
Titre abrégé: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9601804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
02
08
2018
accepted:
17
01
2019
pubmed:
14
2
2019
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
14
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Milk ejection is essential for effective milk removal during breastfeeding and pumping, and for continued milk synthesis. Many women are unable to accurately sense milk ejection to determine whether their infant is receiving milk or, when pumping, to switch the pump to a more effective expression pattern. To determine if changes in bioimpedance parameters are associated with milk ejection in the lactating breast during pumping. 30 lactating women participated in 2 pumping sessions within 2 weeks of each other. During pumping the breasts were monitored with bioimpedance spectroscopy (on either the pumped or the non- pumped breast), and milk flow rate and volume were measured simultaneously. All mothers completed 24-h milk productions. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine associations between milk flow rate and bioimpedance changes. Changes in bioimpedance parameters were greater at the first milk ejection when measured on the pumped breast (median (IQR): R zero: -7 (-17, -4,) % (n = 30); R infinity: -8 (-20, -2) % (n = 29); membrane capacitance: -24 (-59, -7) % (n = 27). Changes in bioimpedance detected in the non-pumped breast were lower at the first milk ejection, R zero: -3 (-8, -2) % (n = 25); R infinity: -5 (-8, -2) % (n = 23); membrane capacitance: -9 (-17, 15) % (n = 24). Smaller less consistent decreases in the bioimpedance characteristics were detected at the second milk ejection in both breasts. Bioimpedance parameters showed a consistent decrease associated with the first milk ejection when electrodes were placed on the pumped breast. Smaller decreases were observed when the non-pumped breast was monitored for the first and second milk ejection. There was wide variation in the magnitude of changes observed, and hence further development of the methodology is needed to ensure reliability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30758699
doi: 10.1007/s10911-019-09426-2
pii: 10.1007/s10911-019-09426-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
177-184Références
Lymphology. 2001 Mar;34(1):2-11
pubmed: 11307661
J Hum Lact. 2003 May;19(2):179-86; quiz 87-8, 218
pubmed: 12744535
Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):361-7
pubmed: 14754950
Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;23(5):1226-43
pubmed: 15380917
J Anat. 2005 Jun;206(6):525-34
pubmed: 15960763
Breastfeed Med. 2006 Spring;1(1):14-23
pubmed: 17661556
Int Breastfeed J. 2009 Oct 26;4:10
pubmed: 19852864
Breastfeed Med. 2011 Aug;6(4):183-90
pubmed: 21770734
Breastfeed Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):100-6
pubmed: 22011129
J Hum Lact. 2012 May;28(2):145-52
pubmed: 22526342
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(3):523-7
pubmed: 24069858
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2014 Jan;156(3):381-3
pubmed: 24771381
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jul 30;15:156
pubmed: 26223256
J Med Eng. 2014;2014:381251
pubmed: 27006932
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Aug;31(4):367-384
pubmed: 29221566
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1987 Sep-Oct;6(5):758-63
pubmed: 3694369
J Appl Physiol. 1974 Mar;36(3):350-3
pubmed: 4814306
J Endocrinol. 1971 Nov;51(3):437-46
pubmed: 5166239
Acta Physiol Scand. 1996 Sep;158(1):1-6
pubmed: 8876741