Optimal crystalloid volume ratio for blood replacement for maintaining hemodynamic stability and lung function: an experimental randomized controlled study.
Fluid replacement
Fluid resuscitation
Lung function
Pulmonary edema
Respiratory mechanics
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 02 2019
13 02 2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2018
accepted:
04
02
2019
entrez:
15
2
2019
pubmed:
15
2
2019
medline:
24
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Crystalloids are first line in fluid resuscitation therapy, however there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations on the volume to be administered. Therefore, we aimed at comparing the systemic hemodynamic and respiratory effects of volume replacement therapy with a 1:1 ratio to the historical 1:3 ratio. Anesthetized, ventilated rats randomly included in 3 groups: blood withdrawal and replacement with crystalloid in 1:1 ratio (Group 1, n = 11), traditional 1:3 ratio (Group 3, n = 12) and a control group with no interventions (Group C, n = 9). Arterial blood of 5% of the total blood volume was withdrawn 7 times, and replaced stepwise with different volume rations of Ringer's acetate, according to group assignments. Airway resistance (Raw), respiratory tissue damping (G) and tissue elastance (H), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were assessed following each step of fluid replacement with a crystalloid (CR1-CR6). Lung edema index was measured from histological samples. Raw decreased in Groups 1 and 3 following CR3 (p < 0.02) without differences between the groups. H elevated in all groups (p < 0.02), with significantly higher changes in Group 3 compared to Groups C and 1 (both p = 0.03). No differences in MAP or HR were present between Groups 1 and 3. Lung edema was noted in Group 3 (p < 0.05). Fluid resuscitation therapy by administering a 1:1 blood replacement ratio revealed adequate compensation capacity and physiological homeostasis similar with no lung stiffening and pulmonary edema. Therefore, considering this ratio promotes the restrictive fluid administration in the presence of continuous and occult bleeding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Crystalloids are first line in fluid resuscitation therapy, however there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations on the volume to be administered. Therefore, we aimed at comparing the systemic hemodynamic and respiratory effects of volume replacement therapy with a 1:1 ratio to the historical 1:3 ratio.
METHODS
Anesthetized, ventilated rats randomly included in 3 groups: blood withdrawal and replacement with crystalloid in 1:1 ratio (Group 1, n = 11), traditional 1:3 ratio (Group 3, n = 12) and a control group with no interventions (Group C, n = 9). Arterial blood of 5% of the total blood volume was withdrawn 7 times, and replaced stepwise with different volume rations of Ringer's acetate, according to group assignments. Airway resistance (Raw), respiratory tissue damping (G) and tissue elastance (H), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were assessed following each step of fluid replacement with a crystalloid (CR1-CR6). Lung edema index was measured from histological samples.
RESULTS
Raw decreased in Groups 1 and 3 following CR3 (p < 0.02) without differences between the groups. H elevated in all groups (p < 0.02), with significantly higher changes in Group 3 compared to Groups C and 1 (both p = 0.03). No differences in MAP or HR were present between Groups 1 and 3. Lung edema was noted in Group 3 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Fluid resuscitation therapy by administering a 1:1 blood replacement ratio revealed adequate compensation capacity and physiological homeostasis similar with no lung stiffening and pulmonary edema. Therefore, considering this ratio promotes the restrictive fluid administration in the presence of continuous and occult bleeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30760207
doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0691-0
pii: 10.1186/s12871-019-0691-0
pmc: PMC6375132
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Substitutes
0
Crystalloid Solutions
0
Isotonic Solutions
0
Ringer's acetate
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21Références
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77
pubmed: 11794169
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 May;82(5):1479-87
pubmed: 9134896
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug 01;14:62
pubmed: 25104915
Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):641-8
pubmed: 14578723
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S61-7
pubmed: 23778513
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;(7):CD007594
pubmed: 23881659
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 12;20:100
pubmed: 27072503
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014 Mar;46(1):28-32
pubmed: 24779116
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jul 1;121(1):261-7
pubmed: 27283919
Perioper Med (Lond). 2015 Apr 10;4:3
pubmed: 25897397
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2247-56
pubmed: 15163774
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jan;33(1):34-41
pubmed: 25760681
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Aug;111(2):458-64
pubmed: 21596916
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):255-64
pubmed: 24169821
Crit Care Med. 1985 Dec;13(12):1020-4
pubmed: 4064712
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD004089
pubmed: 23235602
World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1193-202
pubmed: 23463399
Shock. 2018 Sep;50(3):258-264
pubmed: 29194339
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e110817
pubmed: 25383882
Perioper Med (Lond). 2013 Aug 06;2(1):17
pubmed: 24472418
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010 Jan 31;170(1):76-82
pubmed: 19944781
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jul;33(7):475-82
pubmed: 27058509
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981 May;28(5):416-20
pubmed: 7239539
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1243-51
pubmed: 24066745
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 May;84(5):1680-6
pubmed: 9572817
Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Dec 04;4:38
pubmed: 25625012
Anesth Analg. 2015 Feb;120(2):389-402
pubmed: 25565318
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Sep;73(3):1040-6
pubmed: 1400015
Crit Care. 2012 May 16;16(3):R86
pubmed: 22591647
J Nucl Med. 1985 Jan;26(1):72-6
pubmed: 3965655
Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R30
pubmed: 19257901
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011 Jan;44(1):34-9
pubmed: 20118224
Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):824-36
pubmed: 23732173
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):804-10
pubmed: 27199312
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Jan;72(1):168-78
pubmed: 1537711