TOP2A as marker of response to pegylated lyposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in epithelial ovarian cancers.
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ drug therapy
DNA Topoisomerases, Type II
/ genetics
Doxorubicin
/ analogs & derivatives
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Platinum
/ pharmacology
Polyethylene Glycols
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Ovarian cancer
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
Topoisomerase 2 alpha
Journal
Journal of ovarian research
ISSN: 1757-2215
Titre abrégé: J Ovarian Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474849
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2019
13 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
25
08
2018
accepted:
31
01
2019
entrez:
15
2
2019
pubmed:
15
2
2019
medline:
2
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is frequently treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Unfortunately, most patients do not benefit from treatment. Prediction of response is crucial to optimize PLD use and avoid unnecessary toxicities. We aimed at assessing the value of topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) expression as predictive marker of response to PLD-based therapy in patients with relapsed EOCs. We retrospectively analyzed Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissues from 101 patients with platinum resistant (PR) or partially platinum-sensitive (PPS) EOCs treated with PLD-based chemotherapy beyond second line in three referral cancer centers between January 2010 and June 2018. TOP2A expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC): images of each sample were acquired by optical microscope and analyzed by using automatic counter software. Correlation between TOP2A expression and response to PLD was assessed. Since no cut-off for positivity has been validated yet, we dichotomized TOP2A expression based on a cut-off of 18% (mean value in this study). TOP2A expression beyond cut-off was not prognostic for primary platinum-free interval in our series (p = 0.77) neither for optimal cytoreduction (p = 0.9). TOP2A > 18% was associated with a longer time to progression (TTP) following PLD-treatment, although not statistically significant (p = 0.394). No difference was observed between PR and PPS patients' groups (p = 0.445 and p = 0.185, respectively). Not unexpectedly, patients with TOP2A expression > 18% treated with PLD monotherapy achieved a longer TTP compared with PLD-doublet therapy (p = 0.05). Our data suggest that TOP2A status might predict activity of PLD in patients with PR/PPS EOCs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30760286
doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0492-6
pii: 10.1186/s13048-019-0492-6
pmc: PMC6373097
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
liposomal doxorubicin
0
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Platinum
49DFR088MY
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
DNA Topoisomerases, Type II
EC 5.99.1.3
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17Subventions
Organisme : Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca
ID : GV: VALG_RIC_ LOC_14_01
Références
Ann Oncol. 2001 May;12(5):615-20
pubmed: 11432618
Anticancer Res. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4B):2925-32
pubmed: 11712788
Eur J Cancer. 2004 Jan;40(2):205-11
pubmed: 14728934
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004 Oct;3(10):1207-14
pubmed: 15486187
Int J Oncol. 2004 Nov;25(5):1473-9
pubmed: 15492841
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):890-6
pubmed: 18281662
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Dec;44(18):2791-8
pubmed: 18993056
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Feb;37(3):721-30
pubmed: 19059997
Nat Med. 2009 Jan;15(1):68-74
pubmed: 19122658
Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1234-44
pubmed: 19189349
Mod Pathol. 2009 Apr;22(4):579-88
pubmed: 19270648
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 May;9(5):338-50
pubmed: 19377506
Cancer Invest. 1990;8(2):253
pubmed: 1976032
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 20;28(6):984-90
pubmed: 20038724
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 20;29(12):1578-86
pubmed: 21422418
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Nov;12(12):1134-42
pubmed: 21917518
Ann Oncol. 2011 Dec;22 Suppl 8:viii61-viii64
pubmed: 22180404
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Oct;48(15):2361-8
pubmed: 22541893
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):161-7
pubmed: 22765965
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 09;(7):CD006910
pubmed: 23835762
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Nov;41(20):9243-56
pubmed: 23935120
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi24-32
pubmed: 24078660
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e75193
pubmed: 24098684
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):531-6
pubmed: 24472410
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(7):1-480
pubmed: 25626481
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):627-33
pubmed: 26100858
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):928-36
pubmed: 26115797
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89
pubmed: 27253694
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):727-732
pubmed: 27993805
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jul;37(5):649-654
pubmed: 28325092
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):711-717
pubmed: 28327917
Bioorg Med Chem. 2017 Jul 1;25(13):3437-3446
pubmed: 28511910
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jul;27(6):1141-1148
pubmed: 28574933
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jul;27(6):1134-1140
pubmed: 28640766
Ann Oncol. 1994 Jan;5(1):75-81
pubmed: 8172796