Probing Corticospinal Control During Different Locomotor Tasks Using Detailed Time-Frequency Analysis of Electromyograms.
corticospinal
electromyography
humans
locomotion
neuromuscular control
walking
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2018
accepted:
07
01
2019
entrez:
15
2
2019
pubmed:
15
2
2019
medline:
15
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Locomotion relies on the fine-tuned coordination of different muscles which are controlled by particular neural circuits. Depending on the attendant conditions, walking patterns must be modified to optimally meet the demands of the task. Assessing neuromuscular control during dynamic conditions is methodologically highly challenging and prone to artifacts. Here we aim at assessing corticospinal involvement during different locomotor tasks using non-invasive surface electromyography. Activity in tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscles was monitored by electromyograms (EMGs) in 27 healthy volunteers (11 female) during regular walking, walking while engaged in simultaneous cognitive dual tasks, walking with partial visual restriction, and skilled, targeted locomotion. Whereas EMG intensity of the TA and GM was considerably altered while walking with partial visual restriction and during targeted locomotion, dual-task walking induced only minor changes in total EMG intensity compared to regular walking. Targeted walking resulted in enhanced EMG intensity of GM in the frequency range associated with Piper rhythm synchronies. Likewise, targeted walking induced enhanced EMG intensity of TA at the Piper rhythm frequency around heelstrike, but not during the swing phase. Our findings indicate task- and phase-dependent modulations of neuromuscular control in distal leg muscles during various locomotor conditions in healthy subjects. Enhanced EMG intensity in the Piper rhythm frequency during targeted walking points toward enforced corticospinal drive during challenging locomotor tasks. These findings indicate that comprehensive time-frequency EMG analysis is able to gauge cortical involvement during different movement programs in a non-invasive manner and might be used as complementary diagnostic tool to assess baseline integrity of the corticospinal tract and to monitor changes in corticospinal drive as induced by neurorehabilitation interventions or during disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30761064
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00017
pmc: PMC6361808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17Références
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(4):583-8
pubmed: 10422722
Prog Neurobiol. 2000 Jan;60(1):97-108
pubmed: 10622378
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;111(2):326-37
pubmed: 10680569
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):2307-14
pubmed: 10704506
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74
pubmed: 11018445
J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8838-45
pubmed: 11102492
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Dec;10(6):433-45
pubmed: 11102846
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;113(10):1523-31
pubmed: 12350427
Muscle Nerve. 2004 Jun;29(6):823-33
pubmed: 15170615
J Exp Biol. 2004 Jun;207(Pt 14):2519-28
pubmed: 15184523
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;94(2):934-42
pubmed: 15800077
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Jul;33(3):107-13
pubmed: 16006817
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2580-9
pubmed: 16407422
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Dec;183(4):457-63
pubmed: 17665177
Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):710-4
pubmed: 17723303
Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Apr;38(2):105-16
pubmed: 18423331
Prog Brain Res. 2008;171:353-62
pubmed: 18718326
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;119(12):2813-8
pubmed: 18848803
Gait Posture. 2009 Oct;30(3):370-4
pubmed: 19628392
J Physiol. 2010 Mar 15;588(Pt 6):967-79
pubmed: 20123782
Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):701-8
pubmed: 20836253
J Physiol. 2010 Nov 15;588(Pt 22):4387-400
pubmed: 20837641
J Physiol. 2012 May 15;590(10):2443-52
pubmed: 22393252
Brain. 2012 Sep;135(Pt 9):2849-64
pubmed: 22734124
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):939-46
pubmed: 22742975
Exp Brain Res. 1990;79(1):221-4
pubmed: 2311701
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):673-8
pubmed: 23410656
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Mar;17(2):218-22
pubmed: 23642961
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Aug;41(8):1778-86
pubmed: 23740367
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Jul 30;232:152-6
pubmed: 24880046
Neuron. 2014 Jul 16;83(2):455-466
pubmed: 25033185
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Dec 1;117(11):1215-30
pubmed: 25277737
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Aug;33:25-33
pubmed: 25643847
J Mot Behav. 2016 May-Jun;48(3):205-8
pubmed: 26339981
Cerebellum. 2017 Apr;16(2):602-606
pubmed: 27730516
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 25;4(1):160993
pubmed: 28280596
J Neurosci. 2017 May 31;37(22):5429-5446
pubmed: 28473641
Sci Rep. 2017 May 15;7(1):1922
pubmed: 28507300
Front Neurol. 2017 May 30;8:232
pubmed: 28611728
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Dec;37:35-40
pubmed: 28888972
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Dec;128(12):2493-2502
pubmed: 29101844
Physiol Rep. 2018 Feb;6(3):
pubmed: 29405634
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 19;28(6):R256-R259
pubmed: 29558639
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4984
pubmed: 29563533
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195125
pubmed: 29668731
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197153
pubmed: 29768471
J Biomech. 2018 Jul 25;76:68-73
pubmed: 29853318
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Jun;15(143):null
pubmed: 29875279
Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1403-1404
pubmed: 29954969
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Nov;236(11):3065-3075
pubmed: 30128624