Comparative Safety of Aspiration Thrombectomy Catheters Utilizing Prospective, Active Surveillance of the NCDR CathPCI Registry.


Journal

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
ISSN: 1941-7705
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101489148

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
entrez: 16 2 2019
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 27 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Background Current strategies for ensuring the postmarket safety of medical devices are limited by small sample size and reliance on voluntary reporting of adverse events. Prospective, active surveillance of clinical registries may provide early warnings in the postmarket evaluation of medical device safety but has not been demonstrated in national clinical data registries. Methods and Results The CathPCI DELTA (Data Extraction and Longitudinal Trend Analysis) study was designed to assess the feasibility of prospective, active safety surveillance of medical devices within a national cardiovascular registry. We sought to assess the ability of our surveillance strategy to avoid false safety alerts by conducting an active safety surveillance study of aspiration thrombectomy catheters using data within the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry, where no difference in safety outcomes were anticipated for the primary in-hospital safety outcome of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We performed a propensity-matched analysis of 5 aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices used during percutaneous coronary intervention among 95 925 patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2013. After 33 months of surveillance, no safety alerts were triggered for the primary safety endpoints of death or MACE, with no between-catheter differences observed. The absolute risk of death during acute hospitalization ranged from 5.11% to 5.32% among the most commonly used aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices, with relative risks for death ranging from 0.96 to 1.03. The absolute risk of MACE ranged from 9.78% to 10.18%, with relative risks for MACE ranging from 0.99 to 1.02. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of death or MACE between any of the aspiration thrombectomy catheter devices analyzed. Conclusions The CathPCI DELTA study demonstrates that prospective, active safety surveillance of national clinical registries is feasible to provide near-real-time safety assessments of new medical devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30764652
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004666
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e004666

Subventions

Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD004493
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Arjun Majithia (A)

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA (A.M., F.S.R.).

Michael E Matheny (ME)

VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System and Vanderbilt University, Nashville (M.E.M.).

Jessica K Paulus (JK)

Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (J.K.P.).

Danica Marinac-Dabic (D)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, MD (D.M.-D., N.L.-B.).

Susan Robbins (S)

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).

Henry Ssemaganda (H)

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).

Kathleen Hewitt (K)

National Cardiovascular Data Registry, American College of Cardiology, Washington DC (K.H., A.P.).

Angelo Ponirakis (A)

National Cardiovascular Data Registry, American College of Cardiology, Washington DC (K.H., A.P.).

Nilsa Loyo-Berrios (N)

Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, MD (D.M.-D., N.L.-B.).

Issam Moussa (I)

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (I.M.).

Joseph Drozda (J)

Mercy Health, St Louis, MO (J.D.).

Sharon-Lise Normand (SL)

Harvard Medical School and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (S.-L.N.).

Frederic S Resnic (FS)

Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA (A.M., S.R., H.S., F.S.R.).
Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA (A.M., F.S.R.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH