A quasi-experimental evaluation of marijuana policies and youth marijuana use.


Journal

The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse
ISSN: 1097-9891
Titre abrégé: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7502510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 15 5 2020
entrez: 16 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Marijuana use carries risks for adolescents' well-being, making it essential to evaluate effects of recent marijuana policies. This study sought to delineate associations between state-level shifts in decriminalization and medical marijuana laws (MML) and adolescent marijuana use. Using data on 861,082 adolescents (14 to 18+ years; 51% female) drawn from 1999 to 2015 state Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS), difference-in-differences models assessed how decriminalization and MML policy enactment were associated with adolescent marijuana use, controlling for tobacco and alcohol policy shifts, adolescent characteristics, and state and year trends. MML enactment was associated with small significant reductions (OR = 0.911, 95% CI [0.850, 0.975]) of 1.1 percentage points in current marijuana use, with larger significant declines for male, Black, and Hispanic (2.7-3.9 percentage points) adolescents. Effects of MML increased significantly with each year of exposure (OR = 0.980, 95% CI [0.968, 0.992]). In contrast, decriminalization was not associated with significant shifts in use for the sample as a whole, but predicted significant declines in marijuana use among 14-year olds and those of Hispanic and other ancestry (1.7-4.4 percentage points), and significant increases among white adolescents (1.6 percentage points). Neither policy was significantly associated with heavy marijuana use or the frequency of use, suggesting that heavy users may be impervious to such policy signals. As the first study to concurrently assess unique effects of multiple marijuana policies, results assuage concerns over potential detrimental effects of more liberal marijuana policies on youth use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Marijuana use carries risks for adolescents' well-being, making it essential to evaluate effects of recent marijuana policies.
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to delineate associations between state-level shifts in decriminalization and medical marijuana laws (MML) and adolescent marijuana use.
METHODS
Using data on 861,082 adolescents (14 to 18+ years; 51% female) drawn from 1999 to 2015 state Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS), difference-in-differences models assessed how decriminalization and MML policy enactment were associated with adolescent marijuana use, controlling for tobacco and alcohol policy shifts, adolescent characteristics, and state and year trends.
RESULTS
MML enactment was associated with small significant reductions (OR = 0.911, 95% CI [0.850, 0.975]) of 1.1 percentage points in current marijuana use, with larger significant declines for male, Black, and Hispanic (2.7-3.9 percentage points) adolescents. Effects of MML increased significantly with each year of exposure (OR = 0.980, 95% CI [0.968, 0.992]). In contrast, decriminalization was not associated with significant shifts in use for the sample as a whole, but predicted significant declines in marijuana use among 14-year olds and those of Hispanic and other ancestry (1.7-4.4 percentage points), and significant increases among white adolescents (1.6 percentage points). Neither policy was significantly associated with heavy marijuana use or the frequency of use, suggesting that heavy users may be impervious to such policy signals.
CONCLUSION
As the first study to concurrently assess unique effects of multiple marijuana policies, results assuage concerns over potential detrimental effects of more liberal marijuana policies on youth use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30764656
doi: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1559847
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

292-303

Auteurs

Rebekah Levine Coley (RL)

a Lynch School of Education, Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology , Boston College , Chestnut Hill , MA , USA.

Summer Sherburne Hawkins (SS)

b School of Social Work , Boston College,McGuinn Hall , Chestnut Hill , MA , USA.

Marco Ghiani (M)

c Department of Economics , Boston College, Maloney Hall , Chestnut Hill , MA USA.

Claudia Kruzik (C)

a Lynch School of Education, Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology , Boston College , Chestnut Hill , MA , USA.

Christopher F Baum (CF)

b School of Social Work , Boston College,McGuinn Hall , Chestnut Hill , MA , USA.
c Department of Economics , Boston College, Maloney Hall , Chestnut Hill , MA USA.
d Department of Macroeconomics , German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) , Berlin Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH