Understanding the role of distance, direction and cue salience in an associative model of landmark learning.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 02 2019
14 02 2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
27
12
2018
entrez:
16
2
2019
pubmed:
16
2
2019
medline:
9
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Navigation and spatial memory relies on the ability to use and recall environmental landmarks relative to important locations. Such learning is thought to result from the strengthening of associations between the goal location and environmental cues. Factors that contribute to the strength of this association include cue stability, saliency and cue location. Here we combine an autoregressive random walk model, that describes goal-directed swimming behaviour, with an associative learning model to provide an integrated model of landmark learning, using the water maze task. The model allows for the contribution of each cue, the salience and the vector information provided (both distance and directional) to be separately analysed. The model suggests that direction and distance information are independent components and can influence searching patterns. Importantly, the model can also be used to simulate various experimental scenarios to understand what has been learnt in relation to the cues, thereby offering new insights into how animals navigate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30765774
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38525-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-38525-7
pmc: PMC6376129
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2026Références
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Oct;26(4):439-53
pubmed: 11056884
J Exp Biol. 2001 Jan;204(Pt 1):103-13
pubmed: 11104714
Anim Learn Behav. 2002 May;30(2):73-95
pubmed: 12141138
Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Aug;30(3):177-200
pubmed: 12391785
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jan;30(1):34-44
pubmed: 14709113
Behav Brain Res. 2004 May 5;151(1-2):255-66
pubmed: 15084441
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Oct 5;154(2):385-97
pubmed: 15313026
Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1258-64
pubmed: 15333832
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Oct;57(4):289-314
pubmed: 15513257
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):1-23
pubmed: 15945200
Behav Processes. 2006 Jan 10;71(1):59-65
pubmed: 16338101
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jul;32(3):339-44
pubmed: 16834501
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Apr;33(2):100-14
pubmed: 17469959
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):191-212
pubmed: 17620021
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):31-53
pubmed: 18248113
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5909-14
pubmed: 18413609
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Oct 10;192(2):259-63
pubmed: 18514924
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Sep;28(5):982-96
pubmed: 18717731
Anim Cogn. 2010 Jan;13(1):175-88
pubmed: 19579038
J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Apr;30(2):447-54
pubmed: 20799059
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):255-65
pubmed: 22823419
J Neurosci. 1990 Feb;10(2):420-35
pubmed: 2303851
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Apr;39(2):126-39
pubmed: 23421399
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1033-54
pubmed: 23456412
Learn Mem. 2013 Jun 17;20(7):367-78
pubmed: 23774767
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):378-86
pubmed: 24749502
Behav Processes. 2015 Jul;116:17-27
pubmed: 25921836
Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23
pubmed: 3629243
J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Jun;158(6):835-51
pubmed: 3735168
J Neurosci Methods. 1984 May;11(1):47-60
pubmed: 6471907
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jan;23(1):110-8
pubmed: 9008865