Math Anxiety in Combination With Low Visuospatial Memory Impairs Math Learning in Children.

children individual differences math anxiety math learning processing efficiency theory visuospatial working memory

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 10 03 2018
accepted: 11 01 2019
entrez: 16 2 2019
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 16 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Math anxiety impairs academic achievements in mathematics. According to the processing efficiency theory (PET), the adverse effect is the result of reduced processing capacity in working memory (WM). However, this relationship has been examined mostly with correlational designs. Therefore, using an intervention paradigm, we examined the effects of math anxiety on math learning. Twenty-five 5th graders underwent seven training sessions of multiplication over the course of 2 weeks. Children were faster and made fewer errors in solving trained problems than untrained problems after learning. By testing the relationship between math anxiety, WM, and math learning, we found that if children have little or no math anxiety, enough WM resources are left for math learning, so learning is not impeded. If they have high math anxiety and high visuospatial WM, some WM resources are needed to deal with math anxiety but learning is still supported. However, if they have high math anxiety and low visuospatial WM capacity, math learning is significantly impaired. These children have less capacity to learn new math content as cognitive resources are diverted to deal with their math anxiety. We conclude that math anxiety not only hinders children's performance in the present but potentially has long-lasting consequences, because it impairs not only math performance but also math learning. This intervention study partially supports the PET because only the combination of high math anxiety and low WM capacity seems critical for hindering math learning. Moreover, an adverse effect of math anxiety was observed on performance effectiveness (response accuracy) but not processing efficiency (response time).

Identifiants

pubmed: 30766500
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00089
pmc: PMC6365936
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

89

Références

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jun;9(3):339-42
pubmed: 10808144
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):224-37
pubmed: 11409101
Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81
pubmed: 11523746
Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):83-104
pubmed: 11928892
J Anxiety Disord. 2003;17(6):647-65
pubmed: 14624816
Br J Psychol. 2004 Feb;95(Pt 1):57-79
pubmed: 15005868
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217
pubmed: 15149250
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2005 Jan;83(1):33-42
pubmed: 15607686
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):101-5
pubmed: 15686575
Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):40-61
pubmed: 16637749
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
pubmed: 1736359
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9
pubmed: 17444920
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53
pubmed: 17516812
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2007 Sep;35(5):341-51
pubmed: 18074828
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008 Oct;21(4):417-30
pubmed: 18686056
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Aug;63(8):1619-30
pubmed: 20140810
J Psychoeduc Assess. 2009 Jun;27(3):206-225
pubmed: 20401159
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jan;64(1):10-6
pubmed: 21113858
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):492-501
pubmed: 22434239
Behav Brain Funct. 2012 Jul 09;8:33
pubmed: 22769743
Br J Psychol. 2014 Feb;105(1):92-101
pubmed: 24387098
Biol Psychol. 2014 Dec;103:176-83
pubmed: 25224181
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;16(1):3-22
pubmed: 26250692
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 23;6:1062
pubmed: 26257701
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 01;6:1333
pubmed: 26388824
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 02;7:42
pubmed: 26869951
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jun;31(4):755-764
pubmed: 26935005
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 25;7:508
pubmed: 27199789
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34
pubmed: 27474138
Cognition. 2017 Feb;159:156-162
pubmed: 27960118
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug;17(4):724-736
pubmed: 28474293
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1707
pubmed: 29374271
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1547-54
pubmed: 7870543

Auteurs

Mojtaba Soltanlou (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.

Christina Artemenko (C)

Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Thomas Dresler (T)

LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Andreas J Fallgatter (AJ)

LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Excellence Cluster, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Ann-Christine Ehlis (AC)

LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Hans-Christoph Nuerk (HC)

Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH