Predictors of breastfeeding non-initiation in the NICU.


Journal

Maternal & child nutrition
ISSN: 1740-8709
Titre abrégé: Matern Child Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101201025

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 08 07 2018
revised: 23 01 2019
accepted: 28 01 2019
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 19 6 2020
entrez: 16 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study compared predictors of breastfeeding non-initiation between infants who were and were not admitted to the NICU so that interventions can target high-risk mothers whose infants desperately need breastmilk. This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of singleton Ohio live births using birth certificates, 2006-2015. In babies who were and were not admitted to the NICU, a multivariable logistic regression model assessed the association between breastfeeding non-initiation and predictors relating to the mother, neonate, and labour and delivery events while adjusting for covariables. Of 1,463,506 births, 76,855 infants were admitted to the NICU (5.8% of study population), and breastfeeding was not initiated in 39.4% of them, compared with 31.5% of infants in the newborn nursery, p < 0.001. Apart from abnormal newborn conditions, smoking during pregnancy was the most significant risk factor for not breastfeeding in the NICU (RR 1.91 [95% CI 1.82-2.02]) and newborn nursery (RR 2.10 [95% CI 2.08-2.13]), followed by socioeconomic factors and multiparity. Limited prenatal visits (≤5) were a significantly higher risk factor in the NICU (RR 1.41 [95% CI 1.34-1.49]) than in the newborn nursery (RR 1.24 [95% CI 1.22-1.26]). Intentional home birth and use of infertility treatment were associated with breastfeeding initiation. The rate of breastfeeding initiation is lower in infants admitted to the NICU than those who are not, especially among mothers with limited prenatal care. Interventions should target mothers who smoke because they are least likely to breastfeed, and their babies, who are prone to serious health conditions, could especially benefit from breastmilk.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30767426
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12797
pmc: PMC7198952
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e12797

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):95-100
pubmed: 16523034
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S19
pubmed: 24564770
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 09;11:CD001688
pubmed: 27827515
Pediatr Res. 2010 Apr;67(4):357-62
pubmed: 20035247
Birth. 1998 Sep;25(3):169-74
pubmed: 9767219
Adv Nutr. 2014 Mar 01;5(2):207-12
pubmed: 24618763
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):256-66
pubmed: 17700104
Birth. 2015 Mar;42(1):56-61
pubmed: 25594444
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jan;101(1):55-60
pubmed: 21767302
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1428-35
pubmed: 17079543
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84
pubmed: 18177778
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Feb;41(1):36-40
pubmed: 27836421
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jul;160(7):681-5
pubmed: 16818832
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Mar;159(3):255-60
pubmed: 15753269
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Oct;14(4):e12622
pubmed: 29797420
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;38(3):259-68
pubmed: 19538614
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;45(3):346-58
pubmed: 27016696
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12797
pubmed: 30767426
Adv Neonatal Care. 2005 Apr;5(2):72-88; quiz 89-92
pubmed: 15806448
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 May;155(5):548-53
pubmed: 11343496
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e115-23
pubmed: 16818526
J Hum Lact. 2016 May;32(2):221-8
pubmed: 26243756
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;125(6):1452-1459
pubmed: 26000517
NCHS Data Brief. 2008 Apr;(5):1-8
pubmed: 19389319
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jan;13(1):
pubmed: 27647492
Environ Res. 2016 Nov;151:321-338
pubmed: 27522570
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;44(3):426-38; quiz E14-5
pubmed: 25833199
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):77-102
pubmed: 26801336
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;52:3-12
pubmed: 29779863
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Mar-Apr;33(2):164-74
pubmed: 15095795
J Perinatol. 2008 Jul;28(7):505-10
pubmed: 18368060
Breastfeed Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;11(1):15-20
pubmed: 26565924
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jun;34(7):676-683
pubmed: 27936476
Am J Perinatol. 2017 Aug;34(10):958-965
pubmed: 28329895
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e380-6
pubmed: 16510618
J Perinatol. 2016 Nov;36(11):913-920
pubmed: 27416321
Matern Child Nutr. 2008 Oct;4(4):235-63
pubmed: 18811790
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:59-65.e7
pubmed: 27865429
Pediatr Int. 2007 Dec;49(6):894-7
pubmed: 18045292
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;294(3):455-66
pubmed: 26711837
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):607-19
pubmed: 12949292
J Perinatol. 2007 Jul;27(7):428-33
pubmed: 17443195

Auteurs

Brooke Gertz (B)

OB/GYN Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH, USA.

Emily DeFranco (E)

OB/GYN Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH