Discussing Weight Management With Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Care Using the Small Talk Big Difference Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

medical education obesity primary care

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 10 09 2018
accepted: 25 10 2018
revised: 25 10 2018
entrez: 16 2 2019
pubmed: 16 2 2019
medline: 16 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes universally recommend that adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity be offered individualized interventions to encourage weight loss. Yet despite the existing recommendations, provision of weight management services is currently patchy around the United Kingdom and where services are available, high attrition rates are often reported. In addition, individuals often fail to take up services, that is, after discussion with a general practitioner or practice nurse, individuals are referred to the service but do not attend for an appointment. Qualitative research has identified that the initial discussion raising the issue of weight, motivating the patient, and referring to services is crucial to a successful outcome from weight management. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an Internet-based training program and practice implementation toolkit with or without face-to-face training for primary care staff. The primary outcome is the change in referral rate of patients with type 2 diabetes to National Health Service adult weight management programs, 3 months pre- and postintervention. We used the Behavior Change Wheel to develop an intervention for staff in primary care consisting of a 1-hour Internet-based eLearning package covering the links between obesity, type 2 diabetes, and the benefits of weight management, the treatment of diabetes in patients with obesity, specific training in raising the issue of weight, local services and referral pathways, overview of weight management components/ evidence base, and the role of the referrer. The package also includes a patient pamphlet, a discussion tool, a practice implementation checklist, and an optional 2.5-hour face-to-face training session. We have randomly assigned 100 practices in a 1:1 ratio to either have immediate access to all the resources or have access delayed for 4 months. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be performed. Recruitment to the study is now complete. We will finalize follow-up in 2018 and publish in early 2019. This protocol describes the development and randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates of weight management programs for adults with type 2 diabetes. At a time when many new dietary and pharmacological weight management interventions are showing large clinical benefits for people with type 2 diabetes, it is vital that primary care practitioners are willing, skilled, and able to discuss weight and make appropriate referrals to services. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03360058; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03360058 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74HI8ULfn). DERR1-10.2196/12162.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes universally recommend that adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity be offered individualized interventions to encourage weight loss. Yet despite the existing recommendations, provision of weight management services is currently patchy around the United Kingdom and where services are available, high attrition rates are often reported. In addition, individuals often fail to take up services, that is, after discussion with a general practitioner or practice nurse, individuals are referred to the service but do not attend for an appointment. Qualitative research has identified that the initial discussion raising the issue of weight, motivating the patient, and referring to services is crucial to a successful outcome from weight management.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an Internet-based training program and practice implementation toolkit with or without face-to-face training for primary care staff. The primary outcome is the change in referral rate of patients with type 2 diabetes to National Health Service adult weight management programs, 3 months pre- and postintervention.
METHODS METHODS
We used the Behavior Change Wheel to develop an intervention for staff in primary care consisting of a 1-hour Internet-based eLearning package covering the links between obesity, type 2 diabetes, and the benefits of weight management, the treatment of diabetes in patients with obesity, specific training in raising the issue of weight, local services and referral pathways, overview of weight management components/ evidence base, and the role of the referrer. The package also includes a patient pamphlet, a discussion tool, a practice implementation checklist, and an optional 2.5-hour face-to-face training session. We have randomly assigned 100 practices in a 1:1 ratio to either have immediate access to all the resources or have access delayed for 4 months. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Recruitment to the study is now complete. We will finalize follow-up in 2018 and publish in early 2019.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This protocol describes the development and randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates of weight management programs for adults with type 2 diabetes. At a time when many new dietary and pharmacological weight management interventions are showing large clinical benefits for people with type 2 diabetes, it is vital that primary care practitioners are willing, skilled, and able to discuss weight and make appropriate referrals to services.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03360058; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03360058 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74HI8ULfn).
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/12162.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30767902
pii: v8i2e12162
doi: 10.2196/12162
pmc: PMC6396071
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03360058']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e12162

Informations de copyright

©Katriona Brooksbank, Joanne O'Donnell, Vicky Corbett, Sarah Shield, Rachel Ainsworth, Ross Shearer, Susan Montgomery, Andrew Gallagher, Hannah Duncan, Lorna Hamilton, Valerie Laszlo, Rhonda Noone, Anna Baxendale, David Blane, Jennifer Logue. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 15.02.2019.

Références

Health Bull (Edinb). 2001 Jul;59(4):248-53
pubmed: 12664735
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Jun 06;7:35
pubmed: 16756673
Med J Aust. 2006 Jul 17;185(2):73-5
pubmed: 16842059
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):581-7
pubmed: 18322760
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Aug;58(553):548-54
pubmed: 18682018
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jan;15(1):28-38
pubmed: 21806868
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Apr;37(4):612-9
pubmed: 22777543
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 20;14:78
pubmed: 24552252
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 May;16(3):309-15
pubmed: 25075809
Syst Rev. 2015 May 01;4:61
pubmed: 25927993
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):e325-e335
pubmed: 26386909
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 20;7(11):e018286
pubmed: 29162575
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):879-888
pubmed: 29178635
Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):541-551
pubmed: 29221645
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):637-649
pubmed: 30122305

Auteurs

Katriona Brooksbank (K)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Joanne O'Donnell (J)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Vicky Corbett (V)

Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Hoddesdon, United Kingdom.

Sarah Shield (S)

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Rachel Ainsworth (R)

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Ross Shearer (R)

Glasgow and Clyde Weight Management Service, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Susan Montgomery (S)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Andrew Gallagher (A)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Hannah Duncan (H)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Lorna Hamilton (L)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Valerie Laszlo (V)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Rhonda Noone (R)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Anna Baxendale (A)

National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

David Blane (D)

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Jennifer Logue (J)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH