Prevalence of predicted resistance to doravirine in HIV-1-positive patients after exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Adult
Alkynes
Anti-HIV Agents
/ therapeutic use
Benzoxazines
/ therapeutic use
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cyclopropanes
Delavirdine
/ therapeutic use
Drug Resistance, Viral
/ genetics
Female
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
HIV Reverse Transcriptase
/ antagonists & inhibitors
HIV-1
/ drug effects
Humans
Male
Nevirapine
/ therapeutic use
Nitriles
Pyridazines
/ therapeutic use
Pyridones
/ therapeutic use
Pyrimidines
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Rilpivirine
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Triazoles
/ therapeutic use
Antiretroviral therapy
Doravirine
HIV-1
NNRTI
Predicted resistance
Treatment-experienced subjects
Journal
International journal of antimicrobial agents
ISSN: 1872-7913
Titre abrégé: Int J Antimicrob Agents
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9111860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
20
11
2018
revised:
29
01
2019
accepted:
06
02
2019
pubmed:
16
2
2019
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
16
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated the prevalence of doravirine (DOR) resistance mutations in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-experienced patients. DOR resistance was assessed in samples from NNRTI-experienced patients who underwent genotypic testing for virological failure from the Antiretroviral Response Cohort Analysis (ARCA) database. Intermediate DOR resistance was defined as detection of any of V106A/M, Y188C/H, V108I, and K103N+P225H. High-level DOR resistance was defined as detection of any of Y188L, M230L, G190E, V106A/M+F227L, and V106A/M+L234I. Overall, 6893 patients were included in the study: 64.2% had experienced efavirenz (EFV), 54.4% nevirapine (NVP), 6.8% etravirine (ETR), 7.7% rilpivirine (RPV) and 0.7% delavirdine. Among NNRTI-experienced patients, 12.7% and 6.1% of subjects had intermediate and high-level DOR resistance, respectively. The most common DOR resistance mutation was Y188L. In multivariable analysis, previous EFV use (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.15-2.02) and ETR use (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.34-2.73) were associated with detection of high-level DOR resistance, whilst RPV use was associated with a lower probability of high-level DOR resistance (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.71). Moreover, EFV use (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.19-2.58) and ETR use (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.10-2.68) were associated with detection of the Y188L mutation, whereas RPV use was not (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.50). In Italy, DOR resistance is uncommon among NNRTI-experienced patients, confirming a distinguishing resistance pattern within NNRTIs. However, previous EFV and ETR experience poses a higher risk of DOR resistance. These results support the use of DOR in NNRTI-experienced patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30769200
pii: S0924-8579(19)30030-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.02.007
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkynes
0
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Benzoxazines
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Nitriles
0
Pyridazines
0
Pyridones
0
Pyrimidines
0
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
0
Triazoles
0
etravirine
0C50HW4FO1
doravirine
913P6LK81M
Nevirapine
99DK7FVK1H
Delavirdine
DOL5F9JD3E
HIV Reverse Transcriptase
EC 2.7.7.49
Rilpivirine
FI96A8X663
efavirenz
JE6H2O27P8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
515-519Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.