Misunderstood food date labels and reported food discards: A survey of U.S. consumer attitudes and behaviors.


Journal

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 03 10 2017
revised: 22 12 2018
accepted: 13 01 2019
pubmed: 17 2 2019
medline: 13 9 2019
entrez: 17 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Food date labels such as "best before" and "sell by" are largely unregulated in the United States (U.S.), although new voluntary standards are coming into effect. A U.S. consumer survey was performed in April 2016 to inform policy and education activities related to date labels. The survey was administered online to a nationally representative sample of 1029 adults as part of a biweekly omnibus survey. Survey questions assessed the frequency of discarding food based on date labels by food type, interpretation of label language variations, and knowledge of whether date labels are currently regulated by the federal government. 84% of consumers discard food near the package date at least occasionally. Among date labels assessed, "best if used by" was most frequently perceived as communicating quality, and both "expires on" and "use by" as communicating safety. Over 1/3 of participants incorrectly thought that date labeling was federally regulated, and 26% more were unsure. Respondents ages 18-34 and those with misunderstanding about date labels reported discarding food based on label dates with significantly more frequency than others. Misunderstanding the meaning of food date labels is strongly associated with reports of more frequent food discards. This survey provides new and policy-relevant insights about how Americans use and perceive date labels, and about language used in labeling that may be most effective at communicating desired messages to consumers. As date labeling becomes standardized, this research underlines the need for a strong accompanying communications campaign, and highlights a particular need to reach those ages 18-34.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30770169
pii: S0956-053X(19)30019-4
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.023
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

123-132

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Roni A Neff (RA)

Department of Environmental Health & Engineering and Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., W7010, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: Rneff1@jhu.edu.

Marie Spiker (M)

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: spiker@jhu.edu.

Christina Rice (C)

Food Law and Policy Clinic, Harvard University Law School, 1607 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: crrice1@gmail.com.

Alexandra Schklair (A)

National Consumers' League, 1701 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA. Electronic address: ali.schklair@gmail.com.

Sally Greenberg (S)

National Consumers' League, 1701 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA. Electronic address: sallyg@nclnet.org.

Emily Broad Leib (EB)

Food Law and Policy Clinic, Harvard University Law School, 1607 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: ebroad@law.harvard.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH