Effect of Coexisting KRAS and TP53 Mutations in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.


Journal

Clinical lung cancer
ISSN: 1938-0690
Titre abrégé: Clin Lung Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100893225

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 05 02 2018
revised: 22 11 2018
accepted: 08 12 2018
pubmed: 17 2 2019
medline: 4 4 2020
entrez: 17 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

KRAS and TP53 are common mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biological Program group found adjuvant chemotherapy to be deleterious in patients with coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations. To validate these results, patients with NSCLC tested for KRAS and TP53 mutations and receiving chemotherapy for any stage NSCLC were selected. Mutation status was analyzed using next generation sequencing (Illumina) or multiplex recurrent mutation detection (MassARRAY, Agena Biosciences) assays, and was correlated with clinical and demographic data. Disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was the main endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Among 218 patients, 28 had coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations, 77 TP53, 37 KRAS, 76 had neither KRAS nor TP53 mutation (WT/WT). There was no DFS/PFS difference for the KRAS/TP53 group versus all others among 99 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.44; P = .57), 27 stage III patients who received chemo-radiation (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-2.38; P = .8), and 63 patients who received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.48; P = .33). OS was longer in the WT/WT group compared with any other group (KRAS: HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .043; TP53: HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.3-3.61; P = .0028; KRAS/TP53: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .026). No OS difference was seen for KRAS/TP53 compared with the other groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.75-2.13; P = .38). There was no significant difference in DFS/PFS between the 4 groups. However, OS was longer for patients with TP53 and KRAS wild-type NSCLC who received chemotherapy for any stage compared with patients with KRAS, TP53 mutation, or double mutant tumors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
KRAS and TP53 are common mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biological Program group found adjuvant chemotherapy to be deleterious in patients with coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
To validate these results, patients with NSCLC tested for KRAS and TP53 mutations and receiving chemotherapy for any stage NSCLC were selected. Mutation status was analyzed using next generation sequencing (Illumina) or multiplex recurrent mutation detection (MassARRAY, Agena Biosciences) assays, and was correlated with clinical and demographic data. Disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was the main endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint.
RESULTS
Among 218 patients, 28 had coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations, 77 TP53, 37 KRAS, 76 had neither KRAS nor TP53 mutation (WT/WT). There was no DFS/PFS difference for the KRAS/TP53 group versus all others among 99 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.44; P = .57), 27 stage III patients who received chemo-radiation (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-2.38; P = .8), and 63 patients who received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.48; P = .33). OS was longer in the WT/WT group compared with any other group (KRAS: HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .043; TP53: HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.3-3.61; P = .0028; KRAS/TP53: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .026). No OS difference was seen for KRAS/TP53 compared with the other groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.75-2.13; P = .38).
CONCLUSIONS
There was no significant difference in DFS/PFS between the 4 groups. However, OS was longer for patients with TP53 and KRAS wild-type NSCLC who received chemotherapy for any stage compared with patients with KRAS, TP53 mutation, or double mutant tumors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30770327
pii: S1525-7304(18)30333-4
doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.12.009
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Pharmacological 0
KRAS protein, human 0
TP53 protein, human 0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e338-e345

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Pascale Tomasini (P)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France. Electronic address: pascale.tomasini@ap-hm.fr.

Celine Mascaux (C)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.

Kevin Jao (K)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Catherine Labbe (C)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Suzanne Kamel-Reid (S)

Department of Pathology, University Health Network and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Tracy Stockley (T)

Department of Pathology, University Health Network and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

David M Hwang (DM)

Department of Pathology, University Health Network and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Natasha B Leighl (NB)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Geoffrey Liu (G)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Penelope A Bradbury (PA)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Melania Pintilie (M)

Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Ming-Sound Tsao (MS)

Department of Pathology, University Health Network and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Frances A Shepherd (FA)

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH