Ten-year follow-up of a randomised trial of drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) in infants with post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation.
Cerebral Arteries
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Hemorrhage
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Cognition
Dilatation
Drainage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Expenditures
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
/ economics
Thrombolytic Therapy
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
entrez:
19
2
2019
pubmed:
19
2
2019
medline:
5
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) trial, conducted in 2003-6, showed a reduced rate of death or severe disability at 2 years in the DRIFT compared with the standard treatment group, among preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. To compare cognitive function, visual and sensorimotor ability, emotional well-being, use of specialist health/rehabilitative and educational services, neuroimaging, and economic costs and benefits at school age. Ten-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Neonatal intensive care units (Bristol, Katowice, Glasgow and Bergen). Fifty-two of the original 77 infants randomised. DRIFT or standard therapy (cerebrospinal fluid tapping). Primary - cognitive disability. Secondary - vision; sensorimotor disability; emotional/behavioural function; education; neurosurgical sequelae on magnetic resonance imaging; preference-based measures of health-related quality of life; costs of neonatal treatment and of subsequent health care in childhood; health and social care costs and impact on family at age 10 years; and a decision analysis model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DRIFT compared with standard treatment up to the age of 18 years. By 10 years of age, 12 children had died and 13 were either lost to follow-up or had declined to participate. A total of 52 children were assessed at 10 years of age (DRIFT, The main limitations are the sample size of the trial and that important characteristics were unbalanced at baseline and at the 10-year follow-up. Although the analyses conducted here were prespecified in the analysis plan, they had not been prespecified in the original trial registration. DRIFT improves cognitive function when taking into account birthweight, grade of IVH and gender. DRIFT is probably effective and, given the reduction in the need for special education, has the potential to be cost-effective as well. A future UK multicentre trial is required to assess efficacy and safety of DRIFT when delivered across multiple sites. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80286058. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) trial, conducted in 2003-6, showed a reduced rate of death or severe disability at 2 years in the DRIFT compared with the standard treatment group, among preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation.
OBJECTIVES
To compare cognitive function, visual and sensorimotor ability, emotional well-being, use of specialist health/rehabilitative and educational services, neuroimaging, and economic costs and benefits at school age.
DESIGN
Ten-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
SETTING
Neonatal intensive care units (Bristol, Katowice, Glasgow and Bergen).
PARTICIPANTS
Fifty-two of the original 77 infants randomised.
INTERVENTIONS
DRIFT or standard therapy (cerebrospinal fluid tapping).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary - cognitive disability. Secondary - vision; sensorimotor disability; emotional/behavioural function; education; neurosurgical sequelae on magnetic resonance imaging; preference-based measures of health-related quality of life; costs of neonatal treatment and of subsequent health care in childhood; health and social care costs and impact on family at age 10 years; and a decision analysis model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DRIFT compared with standard treatment up to the age of 18 years.
RESULTS
By 10 years of age, 12 children had died and 13 were either lost to follow-up or had declined to participate. A total of 52 children were assessed at 10 years of age (DRIFT,
LIMITATIONS
The main limitations are the sample size of the trial and that important characteristics were unbalanced at baseline and at the 10-year follow-up. Although the analyses conducted here were prespecified in the analysis plan, they had not been prespecified in the original trial registration.
CONCLUSIONS
DRIFT improves cognitive function when taking into account birthweight, grade of IVH and gender. DRIFT is probably effective and, given the reduction in the need for special education, has the potential to be cost-effective as well. A future UK multicentre trial is required to assess efficacy and safety of DRIFT when delivered across multiple sites.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80286058.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
Identifiants
pubmed: 30774069
doi: 10.3310/hta23040
pmc: PMC6398084
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN80286058']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-116Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HTA/12/35/61
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No competing interests were declared.