Ten-year follow-up of a randomised trial of drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) in infants with post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation.


Journal

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
entrez: 19 2 2019
pubmed: 19 2 2019
medline: 5 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) trial, conducted in 2003-6, showed a reduced rate of death or severe disability at 2 years in the DRIFT compared with the standard treatment group, among preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. To compare cognitive function, visual and sensorimotor ability, emotional well-being, use of specialist health/rehabilitative and educational services, neuroimaging, and economic costs and benefits at school age. Ten-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Neonatal intensive care units (Bristol, Katowice, Glasgow and Bergen). Fifty-two of the original 77 infants randomised. DRIFT or standard therapy (cerebrospinal fluid tapping). Primary - cognitive disability. Secondary - vision; sensorimotor disability; emotional/behavioural function; education; neurosurgical sequelae on magnetic resonance imaging; preference-based measures of health-related quality of life; costs of neonatal treatment and of subsequent health care in childhood; health and social care costs and impact on family at age 10 years; and a decision analysis model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DRIFT compared with standard treatment up to the age of 18 years. By 10 years of age, 12 children had died and 13 were either lost to follow-up or had declined to participate. A total of 52 children were assessed at 10 years of age (DRIFT, The main limitations are the sample size of the trial and that important characteristics were unbalanced at baseline and at the 10-year follow-up. Although the analyses conducted here were prespecified in the analysis plan, they had not been prespecified in the original trial registration. DRIFT improves cognitive function when taking into account birthweight, grade of IVH and gender. DRIFT is probably effective and, given the reduction in the need for special education, has the potential to be cost-effective as well. A future UK multicentre trial is required to assess efficacy and safety of DRIFT when delivered across multiple sites. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80286058. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The drainage, irrigation and fibrinolytic therapy (DRIFT) trial, conducted in 2003-6, showed a reduced rate of death or severe disability at 2 years in the DRIFT compared with the standard treatment group, among preterm infants with intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation.
OBJECTIVES
To compare cognitive function, visual and sensorimotor ability, emotional well-being, use of specialist health/rehabilitative and educational services, neuroimaging, and economic costs and benefits at school age.
DESIGN
Ten-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
SETTING
Neonatal intensive care units (Bristol, Katowice, Glasgow and Bergen).
PARTICIPANTS
Fifty-two of the original 77 infants randomised.
INTERVENTIONS
DRIFT or standard therapy (cerebrospinal fluid tapping).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary - cognitive disability. Secondary - vision; sensorimotor disability; emotional/behavioural function; education; neurosurgical sequelae on magnetic resonance imaging; preference-based measures of health-related quality of life; costs of neonatal treatment and of subsequent health care in childhood; health and social care costs and impact on family at age 10 years; and a decision analysis model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of DRIFT compared with standard treatment up to the age of 18 years.
RESULTS
By 10 years of age, 12 children had died and 13 were either lost to follow-up or had declined to participate. A total of 52 children were assessed at 10 years of age (DRIFT,
LIMITATIONS
The main limitations are the sample size of the trial and that important characteristics were unbalanced at baseline and at the 10-year follow-up. Although the analyses conducted here were prespecified in the analysis plan, they had not been prespecified in the original trial registration.
CONCLUSIONS
DRIFT improves cognitive function when taking into account birthweight, grade of IVH and gender. DRIFT is probably effective and, given the reduction in the need for special education, has the potential to be cost-effective as well. A future UK multicentre trial is required to assess efficacy and safety of DRIFT when delivered across multiple sites.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80286058.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Identifiants

pubmed: 30774069
doi: 10.3310/hta23040
pmc: PMC6398084
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN80286058']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-116

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HTA/12/35/61
Pays : United Kingdom

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were declared.

Auteurs

Karen Luyt (K)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Sally Jary (S)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Charlotte Lea (C)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Grace J Young (GJ)

Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

David Odd (D)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Neonatal Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Helen Miller (H)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Grazyna Kmita (G)

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Cathy Williams (C)

Paediatric Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Peter S Blair (PS)

Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Aída Moure Fernández (AM)

Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

William Hollingworth (W)

Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Michelle Morgan (M)

Department of Psychology, Community Children's Health Partnership, Bristol, UK.

Adam Smith-Collins (A)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

N Jade Thai (NJ)

Clinical Research and Imaging Centre, Bristol, UK.

Steven Walker-Cox (S)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Kristian Aquilina (K)

Paediatric Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.

Ian Pople (I)

Paediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Andrew Whitelaw (A)

Neonatal Neurology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH