Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Facet Fractures Treated Nonoperatively With Hard Collar or Halo Immobilization.
cervical
computed tomography
facet fracture
halo vest
hard collar
nonoperative
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
entrez:
19
2
2019
pubmed:
19
2
2019
medline:
19
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective review. To evaluate the rate of nonoperative treatment failure for cervical facet fractures while secondarily validating computed tomography-based criteria proposed by Spector et al for identifying risk of failure of nonoperative management. Single-level or multilevel unilateral cervical facet fractures from 2007 to 2014 were included. Exclusion criteria included spondylolisthesis, dislocated or perched facets, bilateral facet fractures at the same level, floating lateral mass, thoracic or lumbar spine injuries, or spinal cord injury. Patients were placed into 3 groups for evaluation: immediate operative management, successful nonoperative management, and failed nonoperative treatment requiring surgical intervention. Eighty-eight patients (106 facets) were included. Twenty-one patients underwent operative treatment with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion without any failures. Sixty-seven of these patients were treated nonoperatively with either a hard collar (n = 62) or halo vest (n = 5). Eleven patients failed nonoperative treatment (16.4%), all with an absolute fracture height of at least 1 cm and 40% involvement of the absolute height of the lateral mass. Of the 56 patients successfully treated through nonoperative measures, 8 (14.3%) had fracture measurements exceeding both operative parameters. We conclude that it is safe and appropriate for patients with unilateral cervical facet fractures to receive a trial period of nonoperative management. However, patients who weigh over 100 kg, have comminuted fractures, or have radiographic measurements outside of the proposed computed tomography criteria for nonoperative treatment should be educated on the risks of treatment failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30775208
doi: 10.1177/2192568218771911
pii: 10.1177_2192568218771911
pmc: PMC6362546
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
48-54Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;(109):85-96
pubmed: 1132209
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;38(1):12-6
pubmed: 11423805
Spinal Cord. 2004 Aug;42(8):466-72
pubmed: 15112000
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2827-35
pubmed: 17108837
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1057-65
pubmed: 17473144
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Aug;20(6):416-22
pubmed: 17970181
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):3007-13
pubmed: 18091494
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Nov;73(6):977-81
pubmed: 1955448
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):270-7
pubmed: 24405465
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Feb;24(2):347-354
pubmed: 26516667
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Mar;87(3):159-164
pubmed: 27282114
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jan;28(1):125-137
pubmed: 27886874
Asian Spine J. 2017 Jun;11(3):356-364
pubmed: 28670403
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Jan-Feb;12(1):23-7
pubmed: 3576351
J Trauma. 1993 Jan;34(1):32-9
pubmed: 8437193