The prevalence and diagnosis of 'stereoblindness' in adults less than 60 years of age: a best evidence synthesis.


Journal

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 26 10 2018
accepted: 23 01 2019
entrez: 19 2 2019
pubmed: 19 2 2019
medline: 14 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stereoscopic vision (or stereopsis) is the ability to perceive depth from binocular disparity - the difference of viewpoints between the two eyes. Interestingly, there are large individual differences as to how well one can appreciate depth from such a cue. The total absence of stereoscopic vision, called 'stereoblindness', has been associated with negative behavioural outcomes such as poor distance estimation. Surprisingly, the prevalence of stereoblindness remains unclear, as it appears highly dependent on the way in which stereopsis is measured. This review highlights the fact that stereopsis is not a unitary construct, but rather implies different systems. The optimal conditions for measuring these varieties of stereoscopic information processing are discussed given the goal of detecting stereoblindness, using either psychophysical or clinical stereotests. In that light, we then discuss the estimates of stereoblindness prevalence of past studies. We identify four different approaches that all converge toward a prevalence of stereoblindness of 7% (median approach: 7%; unambiguous-stereoblindness-criteria approach: 7%; visual-defect-included approach: 7%; multiple-criteria approach: 7%). We note that these estimates were derived considering adults of age <60 years old. Older adults may have a higher prevalence. Finally, we make recommendations for a new ecological definition of stereoblindness and for efficient clinical methods for determining stereoblindness by adapting existing tools.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30776852
doi: 10.1111/opo.12607
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

66-85

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : RO1EY020976
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2019 The College of Optometrists.

Auteurs

Adrien Chopin (A)

Faculte de Psychologie et Sciences de l'Education, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland.

Daphne Bavelier (D)

Faculte de Psychologie et Sciences de l'Education, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland.

Dennis Michael Levi (DM)

School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH