Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.
Buccal mucosa
Local recurrence free survival
Margin
Squamous carcinoma
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
revised:
25
01
2019
accepted:
30
01
2019
pubmed:
20
2
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
20
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical margin is one of the most important prognostic factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. There have been studies which refute the standard practice of considering 5 mm (mm) margin as free. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the impact of each mm of margin on the local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and to obtain a cut-off value which would impact the survival the most. This was a retrospective study of 602 treatment naïve patients of buccoalveolar complex cancer. ROC curve was plotted for each millimetre of margin to derive the cut-off margin for maximum LRFS. Multivariate analysis was done for the margin groups to calculate the margin beyond which no significant improvement on LRFS was achieved. Early and advanced tumors were also evaluated separately. A cut off margin of 5.5 mm was achieved on ROC for early (T1-T2) tumors and 6.5 mm cut off was achieved for advanced (T3-T4) tumors. Based on these cut off different margin groups were made. The cohort was grouped into positive margin, 1-5.5 mm, 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm. Hazard ratio for patients with 1-5.5 mm and positive margin was 1.886 (95%CI, 1.15 to 3.09) and 5.58 (95%CI, 1.75 to 17.78) respectively. HR for margin 5.5 mm to 7 mm was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.06). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between margin groups of 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm (p < 0.589) for both early and advanced tumors. Minimum surgical margins of 5.5 mm in the final histopathology should be aimed for in the bucco-alveolar carcinomas. There was significant improvement in LRFS with increasing margins upto 7 mm. Taking margins beyond 7 mm does not improve LRFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30777600
pii: S0748-7983(19)30250-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1033-1038Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.