Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.


Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 14 12 2018
revised: 25 01 2019
accepted: 30 01 2019
pubmed: 20 2 2019
medline: 9 6 2020
entrez: 20 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical margin is one of the most important prognostic factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. There have been studies which refute the standard practice of considering 5 mm (mm) margin as free. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the impact of each mm of margin on the local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and to obtain a cut-off value which would impact the survival the most. This was a retrospective study of 602 treatment naïve patients of buccoalveolar complex cancer. ROC curve was plotted for each millimetre of margin to derive the cut-off margin for maximum LRFS. Multivariate analysis was done for the margin groups to calculate the margin beyond which no significant improvement on LRFS was achieved. Early and advanced tumors were also evaluated separately. A cut off margin of 5.5 mm was achieved on ROC for early (T1-T2) tumors and 6.5 mm cut off was achieved for advanced (T3-T4) tumors. Based on these cut off different margin groups were made. The cohort was grouped into positive margin, 1-5.5 mm, 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm. Hazard ratio for patients with 1-5.5 mm and positive margin was 1.886 (95%CI, 1.15 to 3.09) and 5.58 (95%CI, 1.75 to 17.78) respectively. HR for margin 5.5 mm to 7 mm was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.06). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between margin groups of 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm (p < 0.589) for both early and advanced tumors. Minimum surgical margins of 5.5 mm in the final histopathology should be aimed for in the bucco-alveolar carcinomas. There was significant improvement in LRFS with increasing margins upto 7 mm. Taking margins beyond 7 mm does not improve LRFS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30777600
pii: S0748-7983(19)30250-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1033-1038

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Aseem Mishra (A)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: draseemmishra@gmail.com.

Akshat Malik (A)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: akshatmalik@gmail.com.

Sourav Datta (S)

Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Kolkata, India. Electronic address: souravnrs1@gmail.com.

Manish Mair (M)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: manishmair@gmail.com.

Munita Bal (M)

Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: munitamenon@gmail.com.

Deepa Nair (D)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: drdeepanair@hotmail.com.

Sudhir Nair (S)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: sudhirvr@gmail.com.

Pankaj Chaturvedi (P)

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: chaturvedi.pankaj@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH