Searching for responsible and sustainable recreational fisheries in the Anthropocene.
angling
ethics
fish welfare
recreational fishing
responsible and sustainable fisheries
Journal
Journal of fish biology
ISSN: 1095-8649
Titre abrégé: J Fish Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0214055
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
accepted:
18
02
2019
pubmed:
20
2
2019
medline:
5
9
2019
entrez:
20
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recreational fisheries that use rod and reel (i.e., angling) operate around the globe in diverse freshwater and marine habitats, targeting many different gamefish species and engaging at least 220 million participants. The motivations for fishing vary extensively; whether anglers engage in catch-and-release or are harvest-oriented, there is strong potential for recreational fisheries to be conducted in a manner that is both responsible and sustainable. There are many examples of recreational fisheries that are well-managed where anglers, the angling industry and managers engage in responsible behaviours that both contribute to long-term sustainability of fish populations and the sector. Yet, recreational fisheries do not operate in a vacuum; fish populations face threats and stressors including harvest from other sectors as well as environmental change, a defining characteristic of the Anthropocene. We argue that the future of recreational fisheries and indeed many wild fish populations and aquatic ecosystems depends on having responsible and sustainable (R&S) recreational fisheries whilst, where possible, addressing, or at least lobbying for increased awareness about the threats to recreational fisheries emanating from outside the sector (e.g., climate change). Here, we first consider how the concepts of R&S intersect in the recreational fishing sector in an increasingly complex socio-cultural context. Next, we explore the role of the angler, angling industry and decision-makers in achieving R&S fisheries. We extend this idea further by considering the consequences of a future without recreational fisheries (either because of failures related to R&S) and explore a pertinent case study situated in Uttarakahand, India. Unlike other fisheries sectors where the number of participants is relatively small, recreational angling participants are numerous and widespread, such that if their actions are responsible, they have the potential to be a key voice for conservation and serve as a major force for good in the Anthropocene. What remains to be seen is whether this will be achieved, or if failure will occur to the point that recreational fisheries face increasing pressure to cease, as a result of external environmental threats, the environmental effects of recreational fishing and emerging ethical concerns about the welfare of angled fish.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
845-856Subventions
Organisme : Canada Research Chairs
ID : FECPL
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : DG
Organisme : NSERC and the Canada Research Chairs Program
Organisme : Bonefish and Tarpon Trust (www.bonefishtarpontrust.org)
Organisme : European Maritime and Fisheries Fund of the EU
Organisme : State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany)
ID : MV-I.18-LM-004, B 730117000069
Organisme : German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : 01LC1826E and 033W046A
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.