Prosocial behavior in aging: which factors can explain age-related differences in social-economic decision making?


Journal

International psychogeriatrics
ISSN: 1741-203X
Titre abrégé: Int Psychogeriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007918

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 21 2 2019
medline: 28 5 2020
entrez: 21 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Older adults tend to exhibit more prosocial behavior than younger adults. However, little research has focused on understanding the factors that may explain such differences in the social decision-making process. The first aim was to examine if, and to what degree, the content of social information about a recipient has an impact on young vs. older adults' prosocial behavior. The second aim was to understand if empathic concern, Theory of Mind, and reasoning explain the (expected) age differences in prosociality. Cross-sectional study. The study was conducted in northern Italy in a laboratory setting. Forty-eight younger adults (Mage = 23.29; SD = 2.20) and 48 older adults (Mage = 70.19; SD = 5.13). Prosocial behavior was measured using the Dictator Game in which participants split a sum of money with recipients presented with four levels of description: no information, physical description, positive psychological description, and negative psychological description. In addition, participants performed tasks on emphatic concern, Theory of Mind, and reasoning. Results showed that older adults are more prosocial than younger adults in the Dictator Game. This finding was evident when the recipient was described with positive psychological and physical features. This pattern of results was statistically explained by the reduction in reasoning ability. These findings suggest a relationship between age-related reduction in reasoning ability and older adults' prosocial behavior. The theoretical and practical implication of the empirical findings are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30782235
pii: S1041610219000061
doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000061
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1747-1757

Auteurs

Alessia Rosi (A)

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Marta Nola (M)

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Serena Lecce (S)

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Elena Cavallini (E)

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH