Safety and efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheter insertion in preterm neonates: the ARCTIC randomised-controlled feasibility trial protocol.
2-Propanol
/ administration & dosage
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
/ administration & dosage
Catheter-Related Infections
/ prevention & control
Catheterization, Central Venous
/ methods
Chlorhexidine
/ administration & dosage
Disinfection
/ methods
England
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Skin
antiseptic
biocide
catheter
central Line associated bloodstream infection
disinfection
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 02 2019
19 02 2019
Historique:
entrez:
21
2
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
26
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Catheter-related sepsis is one of the most dangerous complications of neonatal intensive care and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Use of catheter-care 'bundles' has reduced the incidence of catheter-related sepsis, although individual components have not been well studied. Better evidence is needed to guide selection of the most appropriate antiseptic solution for skin disinfection in preterm neonates. This study will inform the feasibility and design of the first randomised controlled trial to examine the safety and efficacy of alcohol-based versus aqueous-based chlorhexidine antiseptic formulations for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation in preterm neonates. The antiseptics to be compared are 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) aqueous and 2% CHG in 70% isopropyl alcohol. The Antiseptic Randomised Controlled Trial for Insertion of Catheters (ARCTIC) is a two-centre randomised-controlled feasibility trial. At least 100 preterm infants born at <34 weeks' gestation and due to undergo percutaneous insertion of a central venous catheter will be randomly allocated to receive prior skin disinfection with one of the two antiseptic solutions. Outcomes include: i) recruitment and retention rates; ii) completeness of data collection; iii) numbers of enrolled infants meeting case definitions for definite catheter-related sepsis, catheter-associated sepsis and catheter colonisation and iv) safety outcomes of skin morbidity scores recorded daily from catheter insertion until 48 hours post removal. The key feasibility metrics will be reported as proportions with 95% CIs. Estimated prevalence of catheter colonisation will allow calculation of sample size for the large-scale trial. The data will inform whether it will be feasible to progress to a large-scale trial. ARCTIC has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service Committee East of England (Cambridge South) (IRAS ID 163868), was adopted onto the National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network portfolio (CPMS ID 19899) and is registered with an International Standard Randomised Control Trials Number (ISRCTN: 82571474; Pre-results) and European Clinical Trials Database number 2015-000874-36. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications and sharing of the findings with parents via the support of Bliss baby charity. ISRCTN82571474; Pre-results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30782955
pii: bmjopen-2018-028022
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028022
pmc: PMC6411256
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
0
chlorhexidine gluconate
MOR84MUD8E
2-Propanol
ND2M416302
Chlorhexidine
R4KO0DY52L
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN82571474']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e028022Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-1013-32076
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Dec;103(12):1233-8
pubmed: 25164200
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Nov 27;2012:
pubmed: 23188865
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 May;32(5):565-7
pubmed: 23340554
Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):1431-6
pubmed: 11389271
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Sep;103(5):F422-F429
pubmed: 29175985
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;27(3):244-50
pubmed: 24751895
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jan;104(1):97-100
pubmed: 30282625
N Engl J Med. 1977 Jun 9;296(23):1305-9
pubmed: 323710
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):792-801
pubmed: 12044127
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Feb;65 Suppl 1:S1-64
pubmed: 17307562
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jul;97(4):F273-8
pubmed: 22174018
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F94-F96
pubmed: 29371239
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Sep;98(5):F466-7
pubmed: 23749052
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Apr;101(464):11-6
pubmed: 22404886
J Infus Nurs. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(4):244-9
pubmed: 12131506
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1994 Apr;10(2):91-3
pubmed: 8029119
Klin Padiatr. 2016 Jul;228(4):208-12
pubmed: 27362412
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70
pubmed: 24330862
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F101-F106
pubmed: 29074717
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;33(3):320-7
pubmed: 15180195