Potential of a machine-learning model for dose optimization in CT quality assurance.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Machine Learning
Male
Middle Aged
Multidetector Computed Tomography
/ standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Injuries
/ prevention & control
Radiography, Thoracic
/ standards
Retrospective Studies
Thoracic Diseases
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Machine learning
Multidetector computed tomography
Quality assurance, health care
Radiation dosage
Thorax
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
17
01
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
27
8
2019
entrez:
21
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate machine learning (ML) to detect chest CT examinations with dose optimization potential for quality assurance in a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Three thousand one hundred ninety-nine CT chest examinations were used for training and testing of the feed-forward, single hidden layer neural network (January 2016-December 2017, 60% male, 62 ± 15 years, 80/20 split). The model was optimized and trained to predict the volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDI RMSE was 1.71, 1.45, and 1.52 for the training, test, and validation dataset, respectively. The scanner and D ML can comprehensively detect CT examinations with dose optimization potential. It may be a helpful tool to simplify CT quality assurance. CT scanner and D • Machine learning can be integrated into CT quality assurance to improve retrospective analysis of CT dose data. • Machine learning may help to comprehensively detect dose optimization potential in chest CT, but an individual review of the results by an experienced radiologist or radiation physicist is required to exclude false-positive findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30783785
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-6013-6
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-6013-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3705-3713Références
Neural Netw. 2017 Nov;95:1-9
pubmed: 28843090
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jun;37(6):1511-1521
pubmed: 29870378
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):8-19
pubmed: 28541574
Acad Radiol. 2018 Dec;25(12):1624-1631
pubmed: 29580788
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):713-718
pubmed: 29155639
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):W226-W233
pubmed: 29570369
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;53:134-147
pubmed: 30036653
Undersea Biomed Res. 1975 Sep;2(3):173-84
pubmed: 15622737
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jan;98:68-74
pubmed: 29279172
Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):663-73
pubmed: 27533027
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Jun;15(6):932-933
pubmed: 29371087
Clin Radiol. 2018 Jul;73(7):677.e13-677.e20
pubmed: 29567269
Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):3-6
pubmed: 26115453
J Radiol Prot. 2018 Jun;38(2):536-548
pubmed: 29261100
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Dec 1;182(4):525-531
pubmed: 30032302
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 08;17(4):320-333
pubmed: 27455491
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):810-817
pubmed: 28395000
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):350-359
pubmed: 29158061
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:398-412
pubmed: 25312773
Radiology. 2015 Aug;276(2):507-17
pubmed: 25897474
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun;7(3):304-312
pubmed: 30050768
Neuroradiology. 2018 Sep;60(9):889-901
pubmed: 30066278
Radiology. 2017 Jan;282(1):182-193
pubmed: 27438166
Eur Radiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):4949-4958
pubmed: 29948072
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 18;16:100
pubmed: 27538955
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jun;11(6):e007217
pubmed: 29914866
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Aug;31(4):415-424
pubmed: 29043528
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 27;13(7):e0200721
pubmed: 30052644
Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(4):508-516
pubmed: 30033447