First-line afatinib vs gefitinib for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): impact of afatinib dose adjustment and analysis of mode of initial progression for patients who continued treatment beyond progression.
Adult
Afatinib
/ administration & dosage
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Female
Gefitinib
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Afatinib
Dose adjustment
EGFR
NSCLC
Time-to-treatment failure
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
21
01
2019
accepted:
09
02
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
entrez:
21
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the randomized phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-treatment failure vs gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We report post hoc analyses of tolerability-guided dose adjustment for afatinib and summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who continued afatinib/gefitinib beyond initial radiological progression in LUX-Lung 7. Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day or gefitinib 250 mg/day until investigator-assessed progression or beyond if beneficial. In case of selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the afatinib dose could be reduced by 10-mg decrements to minimum 20 mg (only dose interruptions were permitted with gefitinib). All randomized patients were treated (afatinib, n = 160; gefitinib, n = 159). Sixty-three patients had afatinib dose reduction (< 40 mg/day; 47 within first 6 months). Dose reduction decreased TRAE incidence/severity (before vs after; all grade/grade 3: 100.0%/63.5% vs 90.5%/23.8%). There was no evidence of significant difference in PFS for patients who received < 40 mg/day vs ≥ 40 mg/day for the first 6 months [median: 12.8 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.90-2.00)]. Twenty-four and 26 patients continued afatinib and gefitinib, respectively, beyond progression in target lesions; median time from nadir of target lesion diameters to initial progression was 6.7 months and 5.6 months. Of these patients, ~ 70% had objective response or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in non-target lesions at initial progression. Protocol-defined dose adjustment of afatinib may allow patients to remain on treatment longer, maximizing clinical benefit even in the presence of radiological progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30783814
doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x
pii: 10.1007/s00432-019-02862-x
pmc: PMC6527523
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Afatinib
41UD74L59M
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Gefitinib
S65743JHBS
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1569-1579Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 1;13(17):5150-5
pubmed: 17785570
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;17(19):6298-303
pubmed: 21856766
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 20;31(27):3327-34
pubmed: 23816960
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22
pubmed: 24439929
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;73(4):759-70
pubmed: 24522402
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):577-89
pubmed: 27083334
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2103-2110
pubmed: 27601237
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v1-v27
pubmed: 27664245
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;70:12-21
pubmed: 27866095
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):270-277
pubmed: 28426106
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1454-1466
pubmed: 28958502