End-points for drug treatment in NASH.
Cirrhosis
Clinical trials
Histology
MRI
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Non-invasive fibrosis models
Journal
Hepatology international
ISSN: 1936-0541
Titre abrégé: Hepatol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101304009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
04
10
2018
accepted:
22
01
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
21
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an increasingly common cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related death (LRD). Consequently, there is a critical need for effective drug therapy that improves clinically relevant end-points. Hepatic steatosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction is increasingly used in the early phase trials examining drugs with anti-steatotic effects. However, the prognostic significance of a reduction in steatosis is unknown, and thus, phase 3 trials require a histological end-point of NASH resolution without fibrosis progression. Nonetheless, it is not clear whether this end-point which requires a liver biopsy reflects a better prognosis. Thus, conditional drug approval currently requires long-term follow-up to demonstrate reduction in 'harder' end-points of cirrhosis, liver transplantation, and LRD. Currently, there is an essential need to develop accurate non-invasive markers that are dynamic to drug-induced changes in underlying disease severity and prognosis to utilize as surrogate end-points for clinical trials in NASH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30783901
doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-09935-6
pii: 10.1007/s12072-019-09935-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
253-258Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Hepatology. 2005 Jun;41(6):1313-21
pubmed: 15915461
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):113-21
pubmed: 16012941
Hepatology. 2006 Apr;43(4):682-9
pubmed: 16502396
Hepatology. 2006 Oct;44(4):865-73
pubmed: 17006923
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(10):1236-43
pubmed: 19670076
Hepatology. 2013 Apr;57(4):1357-65
pubmed: 23175136
Hepatology. 2015 Apr;61(4):1392-405
pubmed: 25557690
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):389-97.e10
pubmed: 25935633
J Hepatol. 2016 Sep;65(3):570-8
pubmed: 27151181
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 May 20;17(5):
pubmed: 27213358
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;9(5):692-701
pubmed: 27582882
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):581-587
pubmed: 28195177
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):e0174982
pubmed: 28369100
Liver Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):1887-1896
pubmed: 28544769
Hepatology. 2017 Sep 11;:null
pubmed: 28892558
J Hepatol. 2018 Feb;68(2):353-361
pubmed: 29223369
Hepatology. 2018 Aug;68(2):763-772
pubmed: 29356032
Hepatol Commun. 2017 Aug 01;1(7):577-585
pubmed: 29404480
Hepatol Commun. 2017 Aug 16;1(8):780-791
pubmed: 29404494
Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):307-310.e2
pubmed: 29660324
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;34(1):241-248
pubmed: 29890010
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):630-637.e8
pubmed: 29908362
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1463-1473.e6
pubmed: 30059671
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0202226
pubmed: 30161179
Liver Int. 2019 May;39(5):924-932
pubmed: 30253043
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):133-141
pubmed: 30291868
Hepatology. 1995 Dec;22(6):1714-9
pubmed: 7489979