Mapping the content of mothers' knowledge, attitude and practice towards universal newborn hearing screening for development of a KAP survey tool.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
24
09
2018
accepted:
01
01
2019
entrez:
21
2
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
30
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding mother's knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) is essential for the success of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) as poor compliance and follow-up remains a global challenge. To determine content area for a questionnaire that measures PCHI-related KAP in rural mothers, we trained moderators who interviewed 145 pregnant women (17 groups) from 5 ante-natal clinics. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, summarised and analysed using thematic framework analysis. Four knowledge themes were identified: 1) PCHI was perceived as the malfunction of hearing leading to disability; 2) a poorly-responsive/communicative child may have PCHI; 3) lifestyle, hereditary and environmental factors are significant causes of PCHI; 4) medical management of PCHI was doubted, with some advocating birth and ancestral rituals. Two themes were identified for attitude: 1) beliefs that PCHI was emotionalised due to the negative lifelong impact on the child and family; 2) UNHS processes were favourable though some preferred other belief systems. Three themes were identified for practice: 1) doctors were the first choice followed by traditional healers; 2) willingness to continue follow-up although challenges exist; 3) minimal family support during consultation. The contextualised KAP of women regarding UNHS processes and PCHI provided content area for the design of a KAP tool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30785897
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210764
pii: PONE-D-18-27836
pmc: PMC6382093
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0210764Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Spring;10(2):134-45
pubmed: 15778210
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Apr;75(4):513-7
pubmed: 21292333
Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):229-42
pubmed: 17240290
Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126 Suppl 1:S19-27
pubmed: 20679316
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Summer;16(3):305-24
pubmed: 21367846
Lancet. 2014 Nov 1;384(9954):1607-39
pubmed: 25443490
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Dec;78(12):2083-8
pubmed: 25288387
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Apr;70(4):619-23
pubmed: 16154646
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 May;134(5):794-800
pubmed: 16647537
Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):655-60
pubmed: 15831139
Int J Audiol. 2016 Dec;55(12):715-722
pubmed: 27686575
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64
pubmed: 17535316
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Jun;26(9):932-5
pubmed: 23327442
Early Hum Dev. 2011 Oct;87(10):647-52
pubmed: 21620593
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Spring;12(2):209-20
pubmed: 17277310
Int J Audiol. 2008;47 Suppl 1:S44-8
pubmed: 18781513
BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9
pubmed: 17332585
Am J Audiol. 2007 Jun;16(1):29-56
pubmed: 17562754
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Dec;7(4):260-3
pubmed: 25436043
J Med Screen. 2006;13(1):20-5
pubmed: 16569301
Int J Audiol. 2007 Feb;46(2):97-106
pubmed: 17365061
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jun;85:1-4
pubmed: 27240486
Laryngoscope. 2011 Feb;121(2):409-16
pubmed: 21271598
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):e1324-49
pubmed: 23530178
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 18;354(20):2151-64
pubmed: 16707752
Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):376-83
pubmed: 19076665
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Feb;78(2):348-53
pubmed: 24380662
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1438-50
pubmed: 20925546