Health-related quality of life in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.
Aged
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Fatigue
/ drug therapy
Female
Giant Cell Arteritis
/ drug therapy
Health Status
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prednisone
/ administration & dosage
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
DMARDs (biologic)
Giant cell arteritis
Inflammation
Patient-reported outcomes
Quality of life
Tocilizumab
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 02 2019
20 02 2019
Historique:
received:
25
09
2018
accepted:
30
01
2019
entrez:
22
2
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) every week or every other week and prednisone tapering achieved superior rates of sustained remission to patients treated with placebo and prednisone tapering in a randomised controlled trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients from this trial is now reported. Exploratory analyses of SF-36 PCS and MCS and domain scores, PtGA and FACIT-Fatigue were performed in patients treated with weekly subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26) or placebo plus 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapers (PBO + Pred-26 or PBO + Pred-52). These analyses were performed on responder and non-responder patients, including those who achieved the primary outcome and those who experienced flare and received escape prednisone doses. Baseline SF-36 PCS, MCS and domain scores were low, indicating impaired HRQOL related to GCA. At week 52, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PCS scores improved with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 but worsened in both PBO + Pred groups (p < 0.001). LSM changes in MCS scores increased with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 versus PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.001). Treatment with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 resulted in significantly greater improvement in four of eight SF-36 domains compared with PBO + Pred-26 and six of eight domains compared with PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.01). Improvement with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in all eight domains compared with five domains with PBO + Pred-26 and none with PBO + Pred-52. Domain scores in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group at week 52 met or exceeded age- and gender-matched normative values (A/G norms). LSM changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores increased significantly with TCZ-QW + Pred-26, exceeding MCID and A/G norms (p < 0.001). Patients with GCA receiving TCZ-QW + Pred-26 reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with those receiving prednisone only. Improvements in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group led to recovery of HRQOL to levels at least comparable to those of A/G-matched normative values at week 52 and exceeded normative values in five of eight domains. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153. Date of registration: February 13, 2013.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) every week or every other week and prednisone tapering achieved superior rates of sustained remission to patients treated with placebo and prednisone tapering in a randomised controlled trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients from this trial is now reported.
METHODS
Exploratory analyses of SF-36 PCS and MCS and domain scores, PtGA and FACIT-Fatigue were performed in patients treated with weekly subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26) or placebo plus 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapers (PBO + Pred-26 or PBO + Pred-52). These analyses were performed on responder and non-responder patients, including those who achieved the primary outcome and those who experienced flare and received escape prednisone doses.
RESULTS
Baseline SF-36 PCS, MCS and domain scores were low, indicating impaired HRQOL related to GCA. At week 52, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PCS scores improved with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 but worsened in both PBO + Pred groups (p < 0.001). LSM changes in MCS scores increased with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 versus PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.001). Treatment with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 resulted in significantly greater improvement in four of eight SF-36 domains compared with PBO + Pred-26 and six of eight domains compared with PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.01). Improvement with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in all eight domains compared with five domains with PBO + Pred-26 and none with PBO + Pred-52. Domain scores in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group at week 52 met or exceeded age- and gender-matched normative values (A/G norms). LSM changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores increased significantly with TCZ-QW + Pred-26, exceeding MCID and A/G norms (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with GCA receiving TCZ-QW + Pred-26 reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with those receiving prednisone only. Improvements in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group led to recovery of HRQOL to levels at least comparable to those of A/G-matched normative values at week 52 and exceeded normative values in five of eight domains.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153. Date of registration: February 13, 2013.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30786937
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1837-7
pii: 10.1186/s13075-019-1837-7
pmc: PMC6381622
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
tocilizumab
I031V2H011
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01791153']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64Subventions
Organisme : Roche
ID : N/A
Pays : International
Références
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1720-7
pubmed: 21807792
J Neuroophthalmol. 2001 Dec;21(4):266-73
pubmed: 11756857
Qual Life Res. 2005 Aug;14(6):1523-32
pubmed: 16110932
J Rheumatol. 2005 May;32(5):811-9
pubmed: 15868614
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):6
pubmed: 25618572
Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:912562
pubmed: 23653652
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 23;7(8):e017073
pubmed: 28838902
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct 15;49(5):703-8
pubmed: 14558057
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1131-43
pubmed: 18489495
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 May;83(5):1573-9
pubmed: 9589658
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 15;17:285
pubmed: 27421253
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;33(2 Suppl 89):S-11-8
pubmed: 25437862
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Mar;68(3):318-23
pubmed: 18413441
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Aug;49(8):1594-7
pubmed: 20371504
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Dec 15;49(6):819-25
pubmed: 14673969
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):253-256
pubmed: 28551169
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):119-25
pubmed: 25362658
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1800-4
pubmed: 19910301
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):346-53
pubmed: 18647248
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;36(9):2055-2062
pubmed: 28405843
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):1885-1895
pubmed: 29186541
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328
pubmed: 28745999
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):657-664
pubmed: 27998620
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Mar;69(3):430-438
pubmed: 27214746
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Jul;38(7):1158-69
pubmed: 23218517