Sarilumab monotherapy compared with adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of incremental cost per effectively treated patient.

IL-6 inhibitor cost per responser disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug rheumatoid arthritis treatment costs

Journal

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
ISSN: 1178-6981
Titre abrégé: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101560564

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 2 2019
pubmed: 23 2 2019
medline: 23 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Treatment outcomes and direct medical costs were examined, from a US health payer perspective, of monotherapy with sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs adalimumab 40 mg SC Q2W/QW in adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who are intolerant of, inadequate responders to, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued methotrexate treatment. Short-term analysis was based on 24-week wholesale acquisition costs of drugs and treatment response observed in the MONARCH Phase III trial (NCT02332590) per American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50 criteria and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate/Good Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Long-term analysis, which also considered drug administration and routine care costs, was conducted via a 6-month decision tree and a 1- to 10-year Markov model with microsimulation of patient profiles from the MOBILITY Phase III trial (NCT01061736). Utilities and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated by mapping 6-month ACR levels to a relative change in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index score and via published algorithms. For sarilumab and adalimumab, respectively, 24-week drug costs were $18,954 and $29,232, and costs per responder were $26,435 vs $50,055 on ACR20; $41,475 vs $98,425 on ACR50; and $22,511 vs $41,230 on EULAR Moderate/Good. Base case results at 10 years for total costs and QALYs were $176,977 and 2.75 for sarilumab and $212,136 and 2.61 for adalimumab, respectively. Sarilumab was consistently the more effective and cost-saving treatment across all short-term and long-term incremental analyses. Sarilumab monotherapy was the economically dominant treatment on incremental cost per responder and incremental cost per QALY compared with adalimumab monotherapy. These results were maintained within the sensitivity analyses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30787625
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S183076
pii: ceor-11-117
pmc: PMC6368117
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

117-128

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure AK and CC are current employees of and stockholders in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MF and UGM are employees of and stockholders in Sanofi. CP is a former employee and current stockholder in Sanofi, and a current employee of Novartis. KM has received grant funding from Pfizer and Rheumatology Research Foundation. An abstract and poster of this paper, based on interim study findings, were presented at the 2017 meeting of the American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (ACR/ARHP) Annual Meeting in San Diego, CA, USA: https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sarilumab-for-the-treatment-of-active-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-an-analysis-of-cost-per-effectively-treated-patient/. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jul;64(7):995-1002
pubmed: 15550533
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S14-8
pubmed: 16273780
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):26-37
pubmed: 16385520
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr;58(4):939-46
pubmed: 18383356
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
pubmed: 20872595
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Feb;71(2):206-12
pubmed: 21998118
J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):54-9
pubmed: 22089466
J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):576-85
pubmed: 22313326
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):718-28
pubmed: 23097311
Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50
pubmed: 23515142
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Dec;72(12):1897-904
pubmed: 23918035
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Nov-Dec;31(6):919-25
pubmed: 24237999
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014 Jun;14(6):841-50
pubmed: 24654999
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2377-86
pubmed: 24941177
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Jul 04;8:913-9
pubmed: 25045250
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1424-37
pubmed: 25733246
Biologics. 2015 May 14;9:35-43
pubmed: 26028960
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Sep 22;64(11):1-63
pubmed: 26460931
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25
pubmed: 26545825
RMD Open. 2015 Aug 15;1(Suppl 1):e000057
pubmed: 26557378
RMD Open. 2015 Nov 18;1(1):e000155
pubmed: 26629366
J Med Econ. 2016 Jun;19(6):568-75
pubmed: 26766553
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 01;17:110
pubmed: 26932312
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610
pubmed: 27140438
Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1360-73
pubmed: 27376373
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Sep;22(9):1088-102
pubmed: 27579831
Rheumatol Ther. 2015 Jun;2(1):85-96
pubmed: 27747494
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):840-847
pubmed: 27856432
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24
pubmed: 3358796
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Oct;27(2):123-40
pubmed: 9355210

Auteurs

Marie Fournier (M)

Health Economics & Value Assessment, Sanofi France, Chilly-Mazarin, France, Marie.Fournier@sanofi.com.

Chieh-I Chen (CI)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Andreas Kuznik (A)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Clare Proudfoot (C)

Sanofi, Guildford, UK.

Usha G Mallya (UG)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Kaleb Michaud (K)

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, USA.

Classifications MeSH