The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials.


Journal

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
ISSN: 1873-7528
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806090

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 26 06 2018
revised: 11 02 2019
accepted: 17 02 2019
pubmed: 23 2 2019
medline: 12 7 2019
entrez: 22 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The current meta-analysis aimed to quantify the effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing pain and identify factors that influence efficacy. Six major databases were systematically searched for trials comparing hypnotic inductions with no-intervention control conditions on pain ratings, threshold and tolerance using experimentally-evoked pain models in healthy participants. Eighty-five eligible studies (primarily crossover trials) were identified, consisting of 3632 participants (hypnosis nö=ö2892, control nö=ö2646). Random effects meta-analysis found analgesic effects of hypnosis for all pain outcomes (gö=ö0.54-0.76, p's<.001). Efficacy was strongly influenced by hypnotic suggestibility and use of direct analgesic suggestion. Specifically, optimal pain relief was obtained for hypnosis with direct analgesic suggestion administered to high and medium suggestibles, who respectively demonstrated 42% (pö<ö.001) and 29% (pö<ö.001) clinically meaningful reductions in pain. Minimal benefits were found for low suggestibles. These findings suggest that hypnotic intervention can deliver meaningful pain relief for most people and therefore may be an effective and safe alternative to pharmaceutical intervention. High quality clinical data is, however, needed to establish generalisability in chronic pain populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30790634
pii: S0149-7634(18)30491-3
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

298-310

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ICA-CL-2017-03-001
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Trevor Thompson (T)

Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK. Electronic address: t.thompson@gre.ac.uk.

Devin B Terhune (DB)

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.

Charlotte Oram (C)

Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK.

Joseph Sharangparni (J)

Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK.

Rommana Rouf (R)

Faculty of Education and Health, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK.

Marco Solmi (M)

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Nicola Veronese (N)

National Research Council, Neurosciences Department, Aging Branch, Padova, Italy.

Brendon Stubbs (B)

Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH