Intensified therapies improve survival and identification of novel prognostic factors for placental-site and epithelioid trophoblastic tumours.
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Chorionic Gonadotropin
/ blood
Cohort Studies
Combined Modality Therapy
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Pregnancy
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Trophoblastic Neoplasms
/ blood
Trophoblastic Tumor, Placental Site
/ blood
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Uterine Neoplasms
/ blood
Journal
British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
21
08
2018
accepted:
23
01
2019
revised:
18
01
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
23
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Placental-site trophoblastic (PSTT) and epithelioid trophoblastic tumours (ETT) are the rarest malignant forms of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Our prior work demonstrated that an interval of ≥48 months from the antecedent pregnancy was associated with 100% death rate, independent of the stage. Here, we assess whether modified treatments for these patients have increased survival and identify new prognostic factors. The United Kingdom GTD database was screened to identify all PSTT/ETT cases diagnosed between 1973 and 2014. Data and survival outcomes from our prior patient cohort (1976-2006) were compared to our new modern cohort (2007-2014), when intensified treatments were introduced. Of 54,743 GTD patients, 125 (0.23%) were diagnosed with PSTT and/or ETT. Probability of survival at 5 and 10 years following treatment was 80% (95% CI 72.8-87.6%) and 75% (95% CI 66.3-84.3%), respectively. Univariate analysis identified five prognostic factors for reduced overall survival (age, FIGO stage, time since antecedent pregnancy, hCG level, mitotic index) of which stage IV disease (HR 6.18, 95% CI 1.61-23.81, p = 0.008) and interval ≥48 months since antecedent pregnancy (HR 14.57, 95% CI 4.17-50.96, p < 0.001) were most significant on multivariable analysis. No significant differences in prognostic factors were seen between the old and new patient cohort. However, the new cohort received significantly more cisplatin-based and high-dose chemotherapy, and patients with an interval ≥48 months demonstrated an improved median overall survival (8.3 years, 95% CI 1.53-15.1, versus 2.6 years, 95% CI 0.73-4.44, p = 0.·005). PSTT/ETT with advanced FIGO stage or an interval ≥48 months from their last known pregnancy have poorer outcomes. Platinum-based and high-dose chemotherapy may help to improve survival in poor-prognosis patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Placental-site trophoblastic (PSTT) and epithelioid trophoblastic tumours (ETT) are the rarest malignant forms of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). Our prior work demonstrated that an interval of ≥48 months from the antecedent pregnancy was associated with 100% death rate, independent of the stage. Here, we assess whether modified treatments for these patients have increased survival and identify new prognostic factors.
METHODS
The United Kingdom GTD database was screened to identify all PSTT/ETT cases diagnosed between 1973 and 2014. Data and survival outcomes from our prior patient cohort (1976-2006) were compared to our new modern cohort (2007-2014), when intensified treatments were introduced.
RESULTS
Of 54,743 GTD patients, 125 (0.23%) were diagnosed with PSTT and/or ETT. Probability of survival at 5 and 10 years following treatment was 80% (95% CI 72.8-87.6%) and 75% (95% CI 66.3-84.3%), respectively. Univariate analysis identified five prognostic factors for reduced overall survival (age, FIGO stage, time since antecedent pregnancy, hCG level, mitotic index) of which stage IV disease (HR 6.18, 95% CI 1.61-23.81, p = 0.008) and interval ≥48 months since antecedent pregnancy (HR 14.57, 95% CI 4.17-50.96, p < 0.001) were most significant on multivariable analysis. No significant differences in prognostic factors were seen between the old and new patient cohort. However, the new cohort received significantly more cisplatin-based and high-dose chemotherapy, and patients with an interval ≥48 months demonstrated an improved median overall survival (8.3 years, 95% CI 1.53-15.1, versus 2.6 years, 95% CI 0.73-4.44, p = 0.·005).
CONCLUSION
PSTT/ETT with advanced FIGO stage or an interval ≥48 months from their last known pregnancy have poorer outcomes. Platinum-based and high-dose chemotherapy may help to improve survival in poor-prognosis patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30792530
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0402-0
pii: 10.1038/s41416-019-0402-0
pmc: PMC6461960
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chorionic Gonadotropin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
587-594Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):48-55
pubmed: 19552948
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(1):102-108
pubmed: 27168005
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jun;137(3):456-61
pubmed: 25773203
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Aug;21(6):1124-30
pubmed: 21738043
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;26(1):111-31
pubmed: 22244665
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Aug;102(2):160-4
pubmed: 16631918
J Reprod Med. 1998 Jan;43(1):53-9
pubmed: 9475150
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):717-29
pubmed: 20673583
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Sep;82(3):415-9
pubmed: 11520134
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Mar;100(3):511-20
pubmed: 16246400
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Apr;129(1):58-62
pubmed: 23274560
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi39-50
pubmed: 23999759
J Reprod Med. 2008 Jul;53(7):457-64
pubmed: 18720919
Br J Cancer. 1977 Jan;35(1):1-39
pubmed: 831755
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Mar;128(3):568-72
pubmed: 23159816
J Reprod Med. 2004 Jun;49(6):447-52
pubmed: 15283052
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;295(1):173-187
pubmed: 27549089
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(4):854-9
pubmed: 10673528
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):208-214
pubmed: 27789086
Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Nov;22(11):1393-403
pubmed: 9808132
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2343-2345
pubmed: 29185430
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Aug;102(2):151-9
pubmed: 16631241
Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1578-83
pubmed: 18453518
J Reprod Med. 2004 Aug;49(8):585-8
pubmed: 15457847
Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):408
pubmed: 25318458
Gynecol Oncol. 1981 Oct;12(2 Pt 1):238-48
pubmed: 6271654
Cancer. 1976 Sep;38(3):1214-26
pubmed: 182351
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Dec;17(6):969-84
pubmed: 14614893
J Reprod Med. 2008 Aug;53(8):643-8
pubmed: 18773632
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001 Jan-Feb;11(1):73-7
pubmed: 11285037
Am J Surg Pathol. 1981 Jan;5(1):75-6
pubmed: 6264815