Complementary activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors against secondary kit mutations in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Animals
CHO Cells
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Cricetulus
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
/ drug therapy
Humans
Imatinib Mesylate
/ pharmacology
Mice
Mice, Nude
Mutation
Phenylurea Compounds
/ pharmacology
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Pyridines
/ pharmacology
Sunitinib
/ pharmacology
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Journal
British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
17
07
2018
accepted:
22
10
2018
revised:
28
09
2018
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
23
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Most patients with KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) benefit from imatinib, but treatment resistance results from outgrowth of heterogeneous subclones with KIT secondary mutations. Once resistance emerges, targeting KIT with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and regorafenib provides clinical benefit, albeit of limited duration. We systematically explored GIST resistance mechanisms to KIT-inhibitor TKIs that are either approved or under investigation in clinical trials: the studies draw upon GIST models and clinical trial correlative science. We subsequently modelled in vitro a rapid TKI alternation approach against subclonal heterogeneity. Each of the KIT-inhibitor TKIs targets effectively only a subset of KIT secondary mutations in GIST. Regorafenib and sunitinib have complementary activity in that regorafenib primarily inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the activation loop, whereas sunitinib inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the ATP-binding pocket. We find that rapid alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib suppresses growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistant GIST more effectively than either agent as monotherapy. Our data highlight that heterogeneity of KIT secondary mutations is the main mechanism of tumour progression to KIT inhibitors in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. Therapeutic combinations of TKIs with complementary activity against resistant mutations may be useful to suppress growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistance in GIST.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Most patients with KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) benefit from imatinib, but treatment resistance results from outgrowth of heterogeneous subclones with KIT secondary mutations. Once resistance emerges, targeting KIT with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and regorafenib provides clinical benefit, albeit of limited duration.
METHODS
We systematically explored GIST resistance mechanisms to KIT-inhibitor TKIs that are either approved or under investigation in clinical trials: the studies draw upon GIST models and clinical trial correlative science. We subsequently modelled in vitro a rapid TKI alternation approach against subclonal heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Each of the KIT-inhibitor TKIs targets effectively only a subset of KIT secondary mutations in GIST. Regorafenib and sunitinib have complementary activity in that regorafenib primarily inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the activation loop, whereas sunitinib inhibits imatinib-resistance mutations in the ATP-binding pocket. We find that rapid alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib suppresses growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistant GIST more effectively than either agent as monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data highlight that heterogeneity of KIT secondary mutations is the main mechanism of tumour progression to KIT inhibitors in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. Therapeutic combinations of TKIs with complementary activity against resistant mutations may be useful to suppress growth of polyclonal imatinib-resistance in GIST.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30792533
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0389-6
pii: 10.1038/s41416-019-0389-6
pmc: PMC6462042
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phenylurea Compounds
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Pyridines
0
regorafenib
24T2A1DOYB
Imatinib Mesylate
8A1O1M485B
KIT protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit
EC 2.7.10.1
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
612-620Subventions
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : I01 BX000338
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA127003
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA168512
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Pathol. 2008 Sep;216(1):64-74
pubmed: 18623623
Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;72(1):210-9
pubmed: 22084396
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 10;24(29):4764-74
pubmed: 16954519
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):620-5
pubmed: 18235121
Gastroenterology. 2005 Feb;128(2):270-9
pubmed: 15685537
Oncogene. 2007 Nov 29;26(54):7560-8
pubmed: 17546049
Int J Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;129(1):245-55
pubmed: 21170960
Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 1;66(1):473-81
pubmed: 16397263
Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 15;66(18):9153-61
pubmed: 16982758
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):E5746-E5755
pubmed: 29866822
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Nov 17;11(12):865-78
pubmed: 22089421
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Nov;9(11):843-56
pubmed: 21031001
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 29;7(13):16581-92
pubmed: 26918731
Science. 1998 Jan 23;279(5350):577-80
pubmed: 9438854
Oncogene. 2008 Sep 18;27(42):5624-34
pubmed: 18521081
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 15;13(18 Pt 1):5398-405
pubmed: 17875769
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Aug;11(8):1770-80
pubmed: 22665524
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 15;13(16):4874-81
pubmed: 17699867
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 10;33(35):4210-8
pubmed: 26371140
Oncogene. 2001 Aug 16;20(36):5054-8
pubmed: 11526490
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5352-9
pubmed: 18955458
Cancer Cell. 2008 Dec 9;14(6):485-93
pubmed: 19061839
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jul 6;3(90):90ra59
pubmed: 21734175
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e20294
pubmed: 21826194
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Apr;34(4):419-23
pubmed: 26928769
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014 May;6(3):115-27
pubmed: 24790651
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2401-7
pubmed: 22614970
Nat Genet. 2014 Jun;46(6):601-6
pubmed: 24793134
Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 15;61(22):8118-21
pubmed: 11719439
Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1329-38
pubmed: 17046465
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;12(6):1743-9
pubmed: 16551858
Science. 2003 Jan 31;299(5607):708-10
pubmed: 12522257
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):295-302
pubmed: 23177515
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1):327-37
pubmed: 12538485
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 1;11(11):4182-90
pubmed: 15930355
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):977-82
pubmed: 22119758
Cancer Discov. 2014 May;4(5):538-45
pubmed: 24589925
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Jul 4;82(13):1107-12
pubmed: 2359136
Nature. 2013 Feb 14;494(7436):251-5
pubmed: 23302800
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 15;20(22):5745-5755
pubmed: 25239608
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1592-605
pubmed: 23509311
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr;8 Suppl 2:S1-41; quiz S42-4
pubmed: 20457867
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 15;347(7):472-80
pubmed: 12181401
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 15;15(18):5902-9
pubmed: 19737946