Development and evaluation of a training program for dialysis nurses - an intervention study.

Dialysis nurses Evaluation Intervention study Stress and resources Workplace health promotion

Journal

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)
ISSN: 1745-6673
Titre abrégé: J Occup Med Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245790

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 17 01 2018
accepted: 30 01 2019
entrez: 23 2 2019
pubmed: 23 2 2019
medline: 23 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A dialysis nurse's work is complex and demanding. Based on the results of a systematic review and a survey study, we developed a health-promoting intervention for dialysis nurses. The aim of this study is to evaluate this intervention. Before the intervention, the dialysis facilities were surveyed, and an analysis workshop was conducted. The intervention incorporated activities at the individual and organizational levels and included three half-day training sessions for dialysis nurses. The evaluation was based on pre-post-follow-up data from the intervention group ( In the intervention group, we found small to medium effect sizes for all measures. However, only sense of community and burnout improved significantly between the pre- and post-tests. Compared to the control group, sense of community increased significantly only in the intervention group. This strengthens the result that the intervention had a particular effect on enhancing the sense of community. The systematically developed intervention for dialysis nurses offers a promising approach for workplace health promotion in the dialysis setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A dialysis nurse's work is complex and demanding. Based on the results of a systematic review and a survey study, we developed a health-promoting intervention for dialysis nurses. The aim of this study is to evaluate this intervention.
METHODS METHODS
Before the intervention, the dialysis facilities were surveyed, and an analysis workshop was conducted. The intervention incorporated activities at the individual and organizational levels and included three half-day training sessions for dialysis nurses. The evaluation was based on pre-post-follow-up data from the intervention group (
RESULTS RESULTS
In the intervention group, we found small to medium effect sizes for all measures. However, only sense of community and burnout improved significantly between the pre- and post-tests. Compared to the control group, sense of community increased significantly only in the intervention group. This strengthens the result that the intervention had a particular effect on enhancing the sense of community.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The systematically developed intervention for dialysis nurses offers a promising approach for workplace health promotion in the dialysis setting.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1186/s12995-019-0223-3 PMID: 30792749 PMC: PMC6371530
pubmed: 30792749
doi: 10.1186/s12995-019-0223-3
pii: 223
pmc: PMC6371530
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

This trial is recorded at the Hamburg Ethics Committee of the Medical Association. All participants were informed about the study and gave their consent to an anonymous publication of data.All participants are informed about the anonymization of the survey data as well as the publication of the results.The authors declare that they have no competing ineterests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Références

Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):270-6
pubmed: 11211637
EDTNA ERCA J. 2001 Oct-Dec;27(4):181-6
pubmed: 11902630
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(12):981-4
pubmed: 12571728
Nephrol Nurs J. 2003 Oct;30(5):523-8
pubmed: 14621631
EDTNA ERCA J. 2004 Oct-Dec;30(4):217-21
pubmed: 15835414
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100
pubmed: 16250744
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005 Dec;31(6):438-49
pubmed: 16425585
Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):95-108
pubmed: 17324035
J Occup Health Psychol. 2008 Jan;13(1):69-93
pubmed: 18211170
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Apr;72(4):209-15
pubmed: 19533583
J Ren Care. 2009 Sep;35(3):127-33
pubmed: 19689694
Psychosoc Med. 2006 Oct 18;3:Doc05
pubmed: 19742072
J Ren Care. 2010 Dec;36(4):174-9
pubmed: 20969734
Nephrol Nurs J. 2011 Jan-Feb;38(1):65-77; quiz 78
pubmed: 21469556
J Ren Care. 2011 Dec;37(4):178-89
pubmed: 22035362
Nephrol Nurs J. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):475-81; quiz 482
pubmed: 22338940
Nephrol Nurs J. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):231-6
pubmed: 22866362
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014 Feb 05;9(1):4
pubmed: 24499468
Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24
pubmed: 2648906
Singapore Med J. 2018 Jan;59(1):28-32
pubmed: 28681056

Auteurs

Maren Kersten (M)

Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Healthcare and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 33/35/37, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.
2Center of Applied Sciences of Health, Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Wilschenbrucher Weg 84A, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany.
ORCID: 0000-0002-8019-1737

Sylvie Vincent-Höper (S)

3Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Heidi Krampitz (H)

CC Compass Consulting, Rothenbaumchaussee 30, 20148 Hamburg, Germany.

Albert Nienhaus (A)

Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Healthcare and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 33/35/37, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.
5Competence Center for Epidemiology and Health Services Research in Nursing (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Bethanien-Höfe 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH