Dabigatran dual therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation patients with or without acute coronary syndrome: a subgroup analysis from the RE-DUAL PCI trial.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ complications
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ therapeutic use
Antithrombins
/ therapeutic use
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Case-Control Studies
Clopidogrel
/ therapeutic use
Coronary Artery Disease
/ complications
Dabigatran
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Proportional Hazards Models
Stroke
/ etiology
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Warfarin
/ therapeutic use
Acute coronary syndrome
Atrial fibrillation
Coronary artery disease
Oral anticoagulants
P2Y12 inhibitors
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 05 2019
14 05 2019
Historique:
received:
11
05
2018
revised:
08
08
2018
accepted:
23
01
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
10
9
2020
entrez:
23
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation, safety and efficacy with dabigatran dual therapy were evaluated in pre-specified subgroups of patients undergoing PCI due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or elective PCI, and those receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment. In the RE-DUAL PCI trial, 2725 patients were randomized to dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg with P2Y12 inhibitor, or warfarin with P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. Mean follow-up was 14 months, 50.5% had ACS, and 12% received ticagrelor. The risk of the primary endpoint, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, was reduced with both dabigatran dual therapies vs. warfarin triple therapy in patients with ACS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.47 (0.35-0.63) for 110 mg and 0.67 (0.50-0.90) for 150 mg]; elective PCI [0.57 (0.43-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.76 (0.56-1.03) for 150 mg]; receiving ticagrelor [0.46 (0.28-0.76) for 110 mg and 0.59 (0.34-1.04) for 150 mg]; or clopidogrel [0.51 (0.41-0.64) for 110 mg and 0.73 (0.58-0.91) for 150 mg], all interaction P-values >0.10. Overall, dabigatran dual therapy was comparable to warfarin triple therapy for the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or unplanned revascularization, with minor variations across the subgroups, all interaction P-values >0.10. The benefits of both dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy compared with warfarin triple therapy in reducing bleeding risks were consistent across subgroups of patients with or without ACS, and patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30793734
pii: 5359476
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz059
pmc: PMC6514838
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Antithrombins
0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Clopidogrel
A74586SNO7
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Dabigatran
I0VM4M70GC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1553-1562Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4
pubmed: 15842354
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Apr 10;49(14):1505-16
pubmed: 17418288
Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):855-63, 863.e2
pubmed: 19061698
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Aug 15;115(4):256-65
pubmed: 1906692
Eur Heart J. 2009 May;30(9):1038-45
pubmed: 19109347
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51
pubmed: 19717844
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57
pubmed: 19717846
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jan 22;8(9):1061-71
pubmed: 23339812
Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15
pubmed: 23415013
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2060-6
pubmed: 23524219
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):981-9
pubmed: 23747760
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3103-8
pubmed: 23982711
Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62
pubmed: 24315724
Circulation. 2014 Apr 15;129(15):1568-76
pubmed: 24463370
Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):e199-267
pubmed: 24682347
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 21;4(1):e001486
pubmed: 25609415
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov;13(11):2119-26
pubmed: 26764429
Heart. 2016 Jun 15;102(12):926-33
pubmed: 26928408
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Oct;39(10):555-564
pubmed: 27565018
Am Heart J. 2016 Oct;180:82-9
pubmed: 27659886
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;50(5):e1-e88
pubmed: 27663299
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 22;375(25):2423-2434
pubmed: 27959713
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;22(6):546-551
pubmed: 28279076
Am J Med. 2017 Nov;130(11):1280-1289
pubmed: 28460853
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1513-1524
pubmed: 28844193
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260
pubmed: 28886622
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 31;70(18):2213-2223
pubmed: 29073947
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):36-45
pubmed: 29126156
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 21;39(16):1330-1393
pubmed: 29562325
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437
Circulation. 2018 Jul 31;138(5):527-536
pubmed: 30571525