Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis: Evaluating the patient perspective using the Patient Opinion Real-Time Anonymous Liaison system: The RA T2T PORTAL study.
Adaptation, Psychological
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ diagnosis
Cost of Illness
Disease Progression
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
New Zealand
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Pain Perception
Patient Participation
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Quality of Life
Remission Induction
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
rheumatoid arthritis
shared decision making
treat-to-target
Journal
International journal of rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1756-185X
Titre abrégé: Int J Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474930
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2018
revised:
14
01
2019
accepted:
22
01
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
23
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the level of agreement among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the principles and recommendations of the treat-to-target (T2T) initiative in New Zealand (NZ) and to further explore specific patient opinions via online iterative surveys. Participants with RA were recruited from rheumatology clinics in NZ and invited to receive and reply to surveys administered via the Patient Opinion Real-Time Anonymous Liaison (PORTAL) system. An enrolment survey recorded demographics, disease duration and treatment and then RA T2T surveys were administered weekly. A Likert scale 1-5 measured agreement with the principles and recommendations and further surveys explored responses of interest identified by investigators from each prior survey. One hundred and ninety patients consented to participate in PORTAL and 132 in the RA T2T surveys. Level of agreement with RA T2T principles was: 93.3% to 99.3% and to the recommendations: 77.3%-100%. The lowest level of agreement 77.3% was with recommendation 8, 3 monthly treatment adjustment, and the highest was 100% agreement with recommendation 10, shared decision-making. Patients agreed less with low disease activity as the target compared with remission (91.4% and 98%). Despite high-level agreement for the use of a disease activity score (95.7%), 23% did not feel the individual components reflected their disease control. Patients rated difficulty coping, erosions on imaging, health-related quality of life and pain all significantly higher than C-reactive protein as indicators of worsening arthritis. Despite a high level of patient agreement with RA T2T this study highlights the importance of patient engagement in the RA T2T process to individualize therapy adjustments, make shared decisions and decide on targets that accurately reflect disease control according to patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30793870
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13514
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
874-879Subventions
Organisme : Unrestricted educational grant to Arthritis NZ from AbbVie NZ Ltd.
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council Translating Research into Practice Fellowship
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.