The role of monitoring and evaluation to ensure functional access to community-based early diagnosis and treatment in a malaria elimination programme in Eastern Myanmar.
Antimalarials
/ administration & dosage
Community Health Services
/ organization & administration
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ methods
Disease Transmission, Infectious
/ prevention & control
Early Diagnosis
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ organization & administration
Health Services Research
Humans
Malaria
/ diagnosis
Male
Myanmar
Pilot Projects
Secondary Prevention
Surveys and Questionnaires
Malaria elimination
Malaria post
Monitoring and evaluation
Surveillance
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2019
22 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
06
10
2018
accepted:
14
02
2019
entrez:
24
2
2019
pubmed:
24
2
2019
medline:
2
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improving access to early diagnosis and treatment (EDT) has increasingly proven to be a major contributor to decreasing malaria incidence in low-transmission settings. The Malaria Elimination Task Force (METF) has deployed malaria posts set up in Eastern Myanmar, providing free uninterrupted community-based access to EDT in more than 1200 villages. Ensuring high quality services are provided by these malaria posts is essential to reaching elimination targets. The present study aimed to determine the functionality of the malaria posts in the METF programme. This report analysed routinely collected data (weekly reports, individual consultation, diagnostic test quality control) and data collected specifically during monitoring and evaluation visits using descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression. The presence of major dysfunctions (stock-outs and reported closing; likely to impair the ability of the population to access EDT) or minor dysfunctions (no formal METF training, lack of regular salary, forms and manual not on-site, and low frequency of supervisor visits) and the ability to anticipate dysfunctions through analysis of weekly reports were assessed. A total of 65% of malaria posts had no major dysfunction identified during monitoring and evaluation visits, while 86% of malaria posts were fully stocked with tests and medicines used for treatment. Diagnosis was correctly conducted with few false positives and rare mis-speciation of results. Malaria post worker knowledge of malaria treatments showed few gaps, mostly in the treatment of more complex presentations. Malaria posts were well utilized in the population, with 94% of consultations occurring within the first 3 days of fever. In the regression analysis, reported stock-outs and delayed weekly reports were associated with observed major and minor dysfunctions in monitoring and evaluation visits, emphasizing the need to reinforce support to malaria post supervisors, who were responsible for the local logistics of supply and data transmission and day-to-day supervision. The malaria posts operating under the METF programme perform to a high standard, with the majority offering uninterrupted access to diagnosis and treatment, and high service uptake in the villages serviced by the programme. However, programme operations can be strengthened by increasing malaria post supervisor visits and re-training malaria post workers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Improving access to early diagnosis and treatment (EDT) has increasingly proven to be a major contributor to decreasing malaria incidence in low-transmission settings. The Malaria Elimination Task Force (METF) has deployed malaria posts set up in Eastern Myanmar, providing free uninterrupted community-based access to EDT in more than 1200 villages. Ensuring high quality services are provided by these malaria posts is essential to reaching elimination targets. The present study aimed to determine the functionality of the malaria posts in the METF programme.
METHODS
METHODS
This report analysed routinely collected data (weekly reports, individual consultation, diagnostic test quality control) and data collected specifically during monitoring and evaluation visits using descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression. The presence of major dysfunctions (stock-outs and reported closing; likely to impair the ability of the population to access EDT) or minor dysfunctions (no formal METF training, lack of regular salary, forms and manual not on-site, and low frequency of supervisor visits) and the ability to anticipate dysfunctions through analysis of weekly reports were assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 65% of malaria posts had no major dysfunction identified during monitoring and evaluation visits, while 86% of malaria posts were fully stocked with tests and medicines used for treatment. Diagnosis was correctly conducted with few false positives and rare mis-speciation of results. Malaria post worker knowledge of malaria treatments showed few gaps, mostly in the treatment of more complex presentations. Malaria posts were well utilized in the population, with 94% of consultations occurring within the first 3 days of fever. In the regression analysis, reported stock-outs and delayed weekly reports were associated with observed major and minor dysfunctions in monitoring and evaluation visits, emphasizing the need to reinforce support to malaria post supervisors, who were responsible for the local logistics of supply and data transmission and day-to-day supervision.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The malaria posts operating under the METF programme perform to a high standard, with the majority offering uninterrupted access to diagnosis and treatment, and high service uptake in the villages serviced by the programme. However, programme operations can be strengthened by increasing malaria post supervisor visits and re-training malaria post workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30795764
doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2677-2
pii: 10.1186/s12936-019-2677-2
pmc: PMC6387481
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimalarials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
50Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1117507
Organisme : Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
ID : Regional Artemisinin Initiative & RAI2E
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 041843
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Health Policy Plan. 1995 Jun;10(2):144-53
pubmed: 10143452
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Mar;19(2):69-79
pubmed: 14982885
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005 May;36(3):578-86
pubmed: 16124420
Lancet. 2007 Jun 23;369(9579):2121-31
pubmed: 17586307
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):321-7
pubmed: 18165509
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Jan;14(1):29-35
pubmed: 19121148
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000404
pubmed: 21283603
Malar J. 2012 Apr 24;11:122
pubmed: 22531245
Lancet. 2013 Sep 7;382(9895):900-11
pubmed: 23594387
Malar J. 2016 Jul 15;15:363
pubmed: 27421656
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 May;17(5):491-497
pubmed: 28161569
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Dec 22;2:98
pubmed: 29384151
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 31;67(6):817-826
pubmed: 29522113
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0195032
pubmed: 29614088
Lancet. 2018 May 12;391(10133):1916-1926
pubmed: 29703425
World Health Forum. 1993;14(4):360-6
pubmed: 8185785
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994 Jan;50(1):85-98
pubmed: 8304577