Global sustainability (health, environment and monetary costs) of three dietary patterns: results from a Spanish cohort (the SUN project).
epidemiology
public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 02 2019
21 02 2019
Historique:
entrez:
24
2
2019
pubmed:
24
2
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the sustainability of the dietary patterns, according to their effects on health and environment and their affordability. Prospective, ongoing cohort study of university graduates. The Spanish SUN project ( A total of 18 429 participants. Information from participants is collected every 2 years by validated questionnaires. We assessed three dietary patterns (the Mediterranean, the Western and the Provegetarian dietary patterns). The rate advancement period (RAP) was used to assess the healthiness of each pattern (considering the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, breast cancer or type 2 diabetes). We also assessed environmental footprints and monetary costs of each dietary pattern. After a median follow-up of 10.1 years, we identified 469 incident cases of the composite endpoint. The Mediterranean dietary pattern exhibited the best RAP (3.10 years gained [95% CI 4.35 to 1.85] for the highest vs the lowest quartile), while the Western pattern was the unhealthiest pattern (1.33 years lost when comparing extreme quartiles). In a scale between 4 and 16 of harmful environmental effects (the lower, the more environmentally friendly), the Provegetarian pattern scored best (8.82 [95% CI 8.75 to 8.88] when comparing extreme quartiles), whereas the Western pattern was the most detrimental pattern (10.80 [95% CI 10.72 to 10.87]). Regarding monetary costs, the Western pattern was the most affordable pattern (€5.87/day [95% CI 5.82 to 5.93], for the upper quartile), while the Mediterranean pattern was the most expensive pattern (€7.52/day [95% CI 7.47 to 7.56]). The Mediterranean dietary pattern was the most overall sustainable option, closely followed by the Provegetarian pattern. The least overall sustainable pattern was the Western dietary pattern. Following plant-based diets, like the Mediterranean or Provegetarian dietary patterns, could be a good option in order to achieve an overall sustainable diet. NCT02669602; Results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30796113
pii: bmjopen-2018-021541
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021541
pmc: PMC6398639
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02669602']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e021541Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2599-608
pubmed: 12826634
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 May;115(5):780-800.e5
pubmed: 25680825
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:320S-8S
pubmed: 24871477
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Nov;63(11):920-7
pubmed: 19762456
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 26;111(34):12342-7
pubmed: 25114254
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Sep;13(9):1364-72
pubmed: 20105389
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;61(2):279-86
pubmed: 17035955
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3 Suppl):660S-663S
pubmed: 12936963
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;58(1):50-60
pubmed: 25940230
Public Health Nutr. 1999 Dec;2(4):505-12
pubmed: 10656469
Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):229-36
pubmed: 8512987
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(8):1573-1582
pubmed: 29380717
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):230-7
pubmed: 18574045
Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):508-14
pubmed: 24975512
Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun;103(12):1808-16
pubmed: 20102675
Nutrition. 2018 Apr;48:24-32
pubmed: 29469016
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:490S-5S
pubmed: 24898230
Clim Change. 2014;125(2):179-192
pubmed: 25834298
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 14;13(6):e1002039
pubmed: 27299701
Food Chem. 2018 Jan 1;238:125-133
pubmed: 28867082
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):518-22
pubmed: 25383533
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;35(6):1417-22
pubmed: 17060332
Br J Nutr. 2016 Mar 14;115(5):817-22
pubmed: 26758710
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1704S-1709S
pubmed: 19339402
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Apr;15(4):725-37
pubmed: 21914258
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):635-42
pubmed: 25961757
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):512-9
pubmed: 8359969
BMC Public Health. 2005 Sep 12;5:94
pubmed: 16156889
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;81(2):341-54
pubmed: 15699220
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct;8(7):920-7
pubmed: 16277809
Nutr Rev. 2015 Oct;73(10):643-60
pubmed: 26307238
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Nov 1;152(9):884-8
pubmed: 11085401
Adv Nutr. 2016 May 16;7(3):445-54
pubmed: 27184272
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3 Suppl):664S-668S
pubmed: 12936964
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Feb;10(2):158-67
pubmed: 17261225
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 05;3(12):e004277
pubmed: 24309174
J Nutr. 2005 Apr;135(4):900-4
pubmed: 15795456